How Do You Calculate the Value of C1 in a Mixed Capacitor Circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mbaban
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitors
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving capacitors, specifically calculating the unknown value of C1 in a mixed capacitor circuit where two capacitors are in parallel and their equivalent is in series with a third capacitor. The given values include C2 and C3, along with charge and voltage parameters.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various equations related to capacitors, including those for series and parallel configurations. There are attempts to derive a quadratic equation based on the relationships between charge and voltage. Some participants express confusion regarding the application of these equations and the implications of initial conditions on the charge of the capacitors.

Discussion Status

Some participants confirm that the problem can be solved, while others seek clarification on the equations used and the assumptions made. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the capacitors and the impact of initial conditions on the charge distribution.

Contextual Notes

Participants question whether the initial charge on all capacitors was zero before applying voltage, as this affects the equations used. There is also mention of the need for clarity in the problem setup and the equations being applied.

mbaban
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Please help me with this "capacitors" problem ?

Two capacitors connected in Parallel and their sum(Ceq12) is connected in series with a third capacitor .

Givens are : (( C1 = unknown value (X) , C2 = 4uF , C3 = 18 uF , Q1 = 300 uC , V = 90V ))

The question wants the value of C1 , ( I find it impossible to solve because givens aren't enough but my teacher insists that it can be done ) Please help ! {if it helps the answer is 5uF but i can figure how }.

OK here is what i did :

Equations :

-Parallel : Ceq = C1 + C2
-series : 1/Ceq = 1/c1 + 1/c2
-Q= CV , C = Q/V , V= Q/C
- in series Q=Q , v=v1+v2
- in parallel V=V , Q=Q1+Q2
those are the needed equations i think

ok here is what i did :
Ps : ( I am not just looking for a fast and easy way to do homework , i actually tried a lot )

-- i used 1/Ct = 1/ceq12 + 1/C3
1/Ct = 1/x+4 + 1/18
-continued to Qt = 18x+72/22+x * 90

-- i reached a quadratic equation in one of my tries
-- and now i reached 1620x-5100 = 0

{ tried many ways , got confused , dead ends , o please help me }
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I find it impossible to solve because givens aren't enough
What did you try so far? Where did you run into problems?
Which equations for capacitors do you know? Please use the homework template, we have it for a good reason.

I can confirm that it is possible to solve the problem.
 
mfb said:
What did you try so far? Where did you run into problems?
Which equations for capacitors do you know? Please use the homework template, we have it for a good reason.

I can confirm that it is possible to solve the problem.

It is my first post that's why , where should i post what i did ?
 
1/Ct = 1/x+4 + 1/18
That fraction should get brackets:
1/Ct = 1/(x+4) + 1/18
Okay, everything in µF, fine.

I don't understand what you did afterwards. You can directly determine Ct from voltage and charge, and simplify the equation to a linear equation: take 1/18 to the left side, invert both sides (if 1/a=1/b, then a=b), that is probably the quickest method.
 
mfb said:
That fraction should get brackets:
1/Ct = 1/(x+4) + 1/18
Okay, everything in µF, fine.

I don't understand what you did afterwards. You can directly determine Ct from voltage and charge, and simplify the equation to a linear equation: take 1/18 to the left side, invert both sides (if 1/a=1/b, then a=b), that is probably the quickest method.

the charge is only Q1 charge , the trick is in the combinations , since it is Vt=v1+v2 in series so the voltage is unknown for Ceq12 , while in parallel Q1 doesn't equal Q2 and that is the issue
 
First let me summarize what we know so far (I'll put units in square brackets, so that they are not confused with variables):

mbaban said:
Two capacitors connected in Parallel and their sum(Ceq12) is connected in series with a third capacitor .

Givens are : (( C1 = unknown value (X) , C2 = 4uF , C3 = 18 uF , Q1 = 300 uC , V = 90V ))

C_{\mathrm{eq}} = \frac{1}{\frac{1}{18 \ \mathrm{[\mu F]}} + <br /> \frac{1}{C_1 + \ 4 \ [\mathrm{\mu F}]}}

and,

90 \ [\mathrm{V}] = V_{1, 2} + V_{3}

mbaban said:
the charge is only Q1 charge , the trick is in the combinations , since it is Vt=v1+v2 in series so the voltage is unknown for Ceq12 , while in parallel Q1 doesn't equal Q2 and that is the issue

Did the problem state that before applying potential to the circuit, that the charge on all capacitors was zero? That makes a difference.

If the initial charge on all capacitors was zero (when the voltage was zero), we can say,

Q_{1} + Q_{2} = Q_{3}

Think about that if it doesn't make intuitive sense. All the current that goes through C3 also goes though either C1 or C2; there's no other place for it to go. And what is current? It's just charge per unit time. The equation is only true though if we happen to know that the charge on all capacitors was zero before current entered the the circuit.

From there we can start combining equations and get to the answer, knowing that C = Q/V.
 
Last edited:
mbaban said:
the charge is only Q1 charge , the trick is in the combinations , since it is Vt=v1+v2 in series so the voltage is unknown for Ceq12 , while in parallel Q1 doesn't equal Q2 and that is the issue
Ah okay, then the equation might get quadratic, indeed.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K