Can you tell me what string theory textbook are you reading,everybody?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the choice of string theory textbooks, with participants highlighting Zwiebach's "A First Course in String Theory" as a favored option due to its pedagogical approach. One participant mentions purchasing the book at a local store for a good price, while another notes that their initial recommendation of Zwiebach to their professor led to a broader discussion among colleagues about its effectiveness for teaching. Compared to "Superstring Theory" by Green, Schwarz, and Witten, Zwiebach is considered more accessible for undergraduates and beginning graduate students, assuming familiarity with relativity and quantum mechanics. However, it primarily covers bosonic strings in detail, with limited discussion on superstrings and brane theory. Overall, Zwiebach is regarded as an excellent resource for self-teaching in string theory.
RiverRich
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Just for survey.:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am reading Zweibach
 
I think he meant Zwiebach's "First Course in String Theory".

Daniel.
 
Yea,I see."A First Course in String Theory".
How much did you buy it? I found it at least $40 on froogle .
 
I've also just purchased Zwiebach. I found it at a local large bookstore/cd place (Fnack) for a good price, which surprised me a little. Not that I'm complaining though.

My promotor gave me Superstring Theory by Green, Schwarz & Witten to start with, but I found it a bit...um...heavy. Zwiebach is a breeze my comparison. I'm actually the one who tipped to prof about it, he didn't consider it before I mentioned it. While attending a conference, he talked about it with a few colleagues, and the consensus was that Zwiebach is the most pedagogical. Plus, he found out that he was referenced in it :biggrin:
 
Zwiebach is aimed at well-prepared undergraduates or, I would guess, beginning graduate students. He assumes you are cool with (and I do mean cool with) relativity and non-relativistic quantum mechanics. If you have any serious hangups with the mathematical representation of either of these, it will impede your understanding of Zwiebach and slow down your pace until you rectify that.

And then he only does bosonic strings in any detail, and has just overviews of special topics in superstrings and brane theory. If you want more than that you just about have to go on to GSW (both volumes) or Polchinski (ditto).

Given all that, Zwiebach is an excellent book for self-teaching.
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...
Back
Top