Can you turn a black hole inside out with charge?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the theoretical implications of feeding protons into a black hole and whether this could lead to a scenario where the black hole's charge could potentially overcome its gravitational pull. Participants explore concepts related to event horizons, cosmic censorship, and the dynamics of charged black holes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that feeding protons into a black hole could create a situation where the repulsive force from excess charge might counteract gravitational attraction.
  • Others argue that this scenario could lead to a naked singularity, potentially violating the cosmic censorship conjecture.
  • A participant references the Reissner-Nordström metric to discuss the implications of charged black holes.
  • There is speculation about whether there would be multiple event horizons for different particles (protons, electrons, neutrons) and how these relate to the inward trajectories of massive particles.
  • Some participants suggest that as protons are added, they would eventually be repelled due to the black hole's charge, complicating the process of adding mass and charge simultaneously.
  • A later reply mentions the historical study of collapsing charged dust and references literature that may provide insights into these dynamics.
  • One participant presents a hypothetical scenario involving charged torpedoes aimed at a black hole, suggesting it could lead to a naked singularity if executed correctly.
  • Another participant discusses the relationship between mass, charge, and angular momentum in black holes, emphasizing the need for sufficient energy to maintain stability when adding charge.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the implications of adding charge to a black hole, and the discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on the outcomes or mechanics involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the existing literature on charged black holes, indicating a lack of detailed studies on the subject, which may affect the depth of the discussion.

Antiphon
Messages
1,685
Reaction score
4
Thought experiment: you locate a modest sized black hole. You then start feeding it protons. Lots and lots of protons.

Will it be able to eat enough protons so that the repulsive force of the excess charge can overcome the inward pull of gravity?

Would there be three different event horizons for protons, electrons and neutrons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that would violate the cosmic censorship conjecture...since it would be a naked singularity...I think? (Just a conjecture though)
 
Thanks for the link. They seem to say it's not possible. So what would actually happen if you started pouring protons into the hole? Would it reach a point where the next proton couldn't go in before the event horizons could diverge enough to uncloth the singularity?
 
Antiphon said:
Would it reach a point where the next proton couldn't go in before the event horizons could diverge enough to uncloth the singularity?

Indeed. After a certain point the proton wouldn't be absorbed by the black hole because if it did so the hole would have over-extremal charge.

I'm not sure of anywhere this is worked out in detail -- people seem to normally gloss over charged black holes since they're not really of astrophysical significance. One would think that it would be in a paper somewhere, and if anyone knows I'd love to see. A friend of mine is actually engaged in work related to this problem right now, and so far we've found the literature quite sparse.
 
Collapsing charged dust was studied extensively back in the 60s and 70s. For example see Plebanski's book, "An Introduction to General Relativity", parts of which are on books.google.com. A recent paper on the subject is 1010.4211v2.pdf on arxiv.
 
Ok, so here's a prescription then for ending the universe or triggering a big bang or something.

You find a fairly large black hole and feed just enough charge into it that it can accept maybe another coulomb or two. You then fire charged torpedoes into it from all six cardinal directions at the same time. Each torpedo contain a 1/2 coulomb charge and travels at near the speed of light. The six torpedoes would be causally disconnected from one another and so the hole would be forced to accept all six charges loads.

Next thing you know, naked singularity.
 
Will it be able to eat enough protons so that the repulsive force of the excess charge can overcome the inward pull of gravity?
Protons outside the hole will be repelled, yes. The rule still holds that nothing already inside can escape.

Would there be three different event horizons for protons, electrons and neutrons?
Event horizons refer to the behavior of outgoing null geodesics. Here we're talking about the inward trajectories of particles with mass. The electrons and the protons don't even follow geodesics, let alone null ones. A charged black hole still has an event horizon, although at a different radius that depends on both e and m.

As the Wikipedia article points out, there's an upper limit to the e/m ratio for a black hole. Here's how a growing hole avoids exceeding the limit. Incoming protons get repelled more and more. Therefore you can't just drop them, and let them fall in of their own accord, you have to fire them into overcome the repulsion. In doing so, you must give the proton additional energy, and the amount of energy needed for this increases as you approach the limit. Additional energy means additional mass. The net result is that you're forced to add so much mass along with the proton that the hole stays below the e/m limit.
 
Try MTW, pg 910

Some notes
M is the mass of the black hole
Q is its charge.
S is its Angular momentum
a = S/m, i.e. angular momentum / unit mass

MTW said:
If a black hole is initally of an extreme Kerr-Newmann" variety with M^2 = a^2 + Q^2, so that one might fear a change which makes M^2 < a^2 + Q^2 (ed note: by adding charge Q to the black hole without increasing M) and thereby destroy the horizon, one's fears are unfounded. Eq 33.56 demands

M delta M >= a delta a + Q delta Q

i.e that in order to get that charge Q into the black hole, one must also add enough energy to increase M^2 enough to satisfy the inequality.

So, if your hypothetical charged torpedoes don't have the sufficient energy, they'll won't make it into the black hole, they'll be repelled by its positive charge. Contrawise, if they do have sufficient energy, then they'll increase the mass of the BH as well as its charge to maintain the relation M^2 > a^2 + Q^2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
4K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K