Can you use modular arithmetic to solve this?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jey1234
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arithmetic
jey1234
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
I came across a problem like this (not homework)
x^2+y^2-k

For example,
x^2+y^2-24 \text{ ,n=4}
x^2+y^2-45 \text{ ,n=8}

If x and y are any positive integers (not given) and k is a positive integer (given), is this expression divisible by n (a positive integer that is given). A friend told me that you could use modular arithmetic to solve this. Having never learned modular arithmetic, I don't if that is true. Is it? And if yes, can someone please point me to some online resources where I can learn it? Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, modular arithmetic is something that is really easy to mess with after you have learned it, but it is kind of strange to learn. I suggest reading the wikipedia article and then try to understand what I am about to say:

So, say you have x^2 + y^2 - k and you want to know if this is divisible by n. If you think about it, this is the same as saying that if you divide x^2 + y^2 by n and get a remainder r this is the same as the remainder that you get after dividing k by n. In this case, we say that x^2 + y^2 and k are congruent modulo n. Now, each integer n has a finite number of squares \mod n which means that we only need to check a finite number of combinations.

Example: does 4 divide x^2+y^2-24 for any x,y? Well, 24 is 0 \mod 4, and the only squares \mod 4 are 0,1 (e.g. 2^2 = 0 \mod 4 and 1^2 = 1 \mod 4.) So, the answer is yes: if x,y are either 0 \mod 4 or 2 \mod 4 then 4 divides x^2 + y^2 - 24. For example, let x = 10 (which is 2 mod 4) and let y=12 (which is 0 mod 4). Then x^2 + y^2 - 24 = 100 + 144 - 24 = 220 = 4*55.

This might not make sense, but it will after you read the wikipedia article and play aroud with it for a while.
 
I followed you until ("the only squares mod 4 are 0,1"). I don't understand what you mean by that. Could you please elaborate? Thanks.
 
jey1234 said:
I followed you until ("the only squares mod 4 are 0,1"). I don't understand what you mean by that. Could you please elaborate? Thanks.
Square an even number: (2n)2 = 4n2 = 0 mod 4.
Square an odd number: (2n+1)2 = 4n2+4n+1 = 1 mod 4.
 
jey1234 said:
I followed you until ("the only squares mod 4 are 0,1"). I don't understand what you mean by that. Could you please elaborate? Thanks.

To check which numbers are squares \mod n, all you need to do is square the integers less than n and see what the squares are. With n=4 this means we only need to check 1,2,3. So 1^2 = 1 \mod 4, 2^2 = 4 = 0 \mod 4 and 3^2 = 9 = 1 \mod 4. So, the only squares \mod 4 are 0,1.

You can carry this same procedure out with any integer n.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top