Can Zero MVAR Limits Be Set on a Slack Bus During Load Flow Analysis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Serena_hm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bus
AI Thread Summary
Setting MVAR limits of a Slack bus to zero for both maximum and minimum during load flow analysis is possible, but it may not yield a convergent solution. The negative sign in the limit indicates whether the reactive power is leading or lagging. If the slack bus generates -373 MVAR, it exceeds the specified minimum limit of -42.7 MVAR. The discussion also prompts inquiries about the specific software being used and requests for a power flow diagram. Overall, understanding the implications of MVAR limits is crucial for effective load flow analysis.
Serena_hm
Messages
18
Reaction score
2
Question related to Slack bus ( help please ) !

Can we set the MVAR limits of a Slack bus as Zero ( for both MAx. and Min. limits ) during operating load flow program !?

and what does the minus sign exactly mean when it's written in the limit , such this one :
Qmin. (MVAR) = -42.7
Qmax. (MVAR ) = 97

if the slack generates -373...did the limit is already exceeded !?
PS : excitation is 105%

thanks for your attention.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Serena_hm said:
Can we set the MVAR limits of a Slack bus as Zero ( for both MAx. and Min. limits ) during operating load flow program !?

You can, but you probably will not converge on a solution.

and what does the minus sign exactly mean when it's written in the limit , such this one :
Qmin. (MVAR) = -42.7
Qmax. (MVAR ) = 97

Sign denotes leading vs. lagging.

if the slack generates -373...did the limit is already exceeded !?


PS : excitation is 105%

thanks for your attention.

Which program are you using? Can you post your power flow diagram?
(Is this homework?)
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
16K
Back
Top