Can Zero Torque Occur if Angular Momentum and Velocity Vectors Aren't Parallel?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between angular momentum and angular velocity in rigid body dynamics. It confirms that zero torque can occur even when the angular momentum vector (L) and angular velocity vector (ω) are not parallel, particularly in cases where the angular velocity remains constant. The key takeaway is that the moment of inertia (I) must be treated as a 3x3 matrix rather than a scalar, which allows for non-collinearity between L and ω without implying the presence of torque.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rigid body dynamics
  • Familiarity with angular momentum and angular velocity concepts
  • Knowledge of moment of inertia as a 3x3 matrix
  • Basic grasp of torque and its calculation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the moment of inertia matrix in rigid body rotation
  • Learn about the implications of non-collinear angular momentum and angular velocity
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of torque from angular momentum
  • Investigate examples of rigid body dynamics with constant angular velocity
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as educators and professionals involved in engineering and applied physics who require a deeper understanding of angular momentum and torque relationships in rigid bodies.

KBriggs
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

I have a physics problem here and I have come across an odd scenario, I wonder if you could tell me if this means that I have the wrong answer.

I have an ideal bar rotating about an arbitrary axis. The angular velocity vector [tex]\omega[/tex] is NOT colinear with the angular momentum vector. However, [tex]\omega[/tex] is constant, so when I try to find the torque on the bar by using hte time dervitive of the angular momentum vector, I get 0.

My question is this: is it possible for there to be 0 torque on the bar if the angular momentum and angular velocity vectors are not parallel? Because I was under the impression that the only time when they were not parallel was when there was some applied torque, but I have done this problem using three different methods now, all with the same result.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, KBriggs,

In general, the relationship between L and w for a rigidly rotating body is not L=Iw, where I is a scalar; I has to be a 3x3 matrix. Even for an isolated body with no torques acting on it, it is not necessary for L and w to be collinear. Here is a discussion of this kind of thing that might help: http://www.lightandmatter.com/html_books/0sn/ch04/ch04.html#Section4.3

Ben
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks

So getting 0 torque doesn't mean I went wrong somewhere.

I know about the matrix notation, but I am new to this stuff so I am getting a little lost in the definitions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K