Canada AM's Unfortunate Interview with Ben Stein

  • Thread starter Thread starter Danger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Canada Interview
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around an interview with Ben Stein on 'Canada AM,' where participants express surprise at his treatment as a credible figure by a reputable news organization. Initial reactions highlight skepticism about Stein's mental competence, especially regarding his views on Intelligent Design and creationism. Participants note Stein's background as a speechwriter for U.S. presidents, but his controversial statements, particularly linking science to historical atrocities, draw criticism. The conversation shifts to a broader critique of media bias, particularly comparing Fox News to other outlets, with some arguing that all media has bias but Fox is unfairly singled out. The debate touches on the importance of respecting differing opinions, even when they are deemed misguided, and the challenges of engaging with individuals who hold extreme views. Overall, the thread reflects a mix of frustration with media practices, skepticism of Stein's viewpoints, and a discussion on the nature of bias in news reporting.
  • #31
Occasionally, I watch a Fox News Network program, and I am surprised when "balanced" reporting actually occurs (there is a difference between the cable channel "news" and the news programs on Fox TV). Many times I have watched the bully tactics of O'Reilly and Hannity, specifically, where they shout over the people with opposing viewpoints. Only a week ago I watched as Hannity edited an Obama quote to make it sound appropriate to suit his point. But his guest happened to know the full quote and managed to squeez it through Hannity's rantings "what do you mean edited? I'm looking at the transcript right here..."

Here's a tactic I have seen over and over on Fox News. Some guy with an opinion is brought on. In the initial banter, the anchor "pumps up" the cedulity of the guest with words like "Now I don't know much about this, but you're a leading expert in the field..." or "It's one thing when a pundit like me states an opinion, but you have actually been there and you know what you're talking about." Look for it, and you will see it all the time.

Again, this is the Fox News Network, much farther to the right than others are to the left. Fox TV news stations are much closer to center.

For the best quality, and most balanced news, I stick with the NPR news programs Morning Edition and All Things Considered. A majority of the "Opinion Pieces" from their "News analysts" (Ted Koppel, Daniel Schorr) are a bit to the left, but nothing even close to the Fox News pundits.
Read a few:http://www.npr.org/templates/topics/topic.php?topicId=1057
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Wait, is O'Reilly a creationist scum as well?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 161 ·
6
Replies
161
Views
14K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
Replies
89
Views
14K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
8K
Replies
40
Views
13K