Cap input filter rectification efficiency

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the efficiency of rectification in power supply circuits, specifically focusing on full-wave rectifiers and capacitor input filters. Participants explore the definitions and calculations of rectification efficiency, addressing misconceptions and the implications of terminology used in various sources.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the theoretical maximum efficiency of a full-wave rectifier circuit is around 82%, questioning where losses occur if not in the source or rectifiers.
  • Another participant challenges the definition of "rectification efficiency," suggesting it is being used incorrectly in some sources, which leads to confusion regarding its calculation.
  • It is proposed that the term "efficiency" should refer to the ratio of output power to input power, while some sources use it to describe the ratio of DC output power to total output power.
  • A participant explains that for an ideal full-wave rectifier, the output power can be divided into DC and AC components, with specific percentages attributed to each.
  • Discussion includes the impact of diode voltage drops on rectification power loss, particularly in full-wave bridge configurations.
  • Several participants agree on the need for clearer definitions in the literature to avoid confusion regarding efficiency and effectiveness in rectification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the correct use of the term "efficiency" and its implications in various sources. While some agree on the need for clearer definitions, there is no consensus on the terminology or the calculations presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in the discussion include varying definitions of efficiency across sources, potential misunderstandings in calculations, and the lack of consensus on terminology. Specific mathematical steps and assumptions are not fully resolved.

bitrex
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
A question regarding power supply efficiency: The theoretical maximum efficiency of a full-wave rectifier circuit with a resistive load and no smoothing is around 82%. In the calculations to derive that the resistance of the source or the rectifiers does not enter into the equation, so the first question would be: If the loss does not take place in the resistance of the source or in the resistance of the rectifiers where does it take place? I had also assumed that a similar theoretical limit applied to a capacitor input filter, but have been informed that this is not the case and the efficiency can go to 100% with a rectifier and source with no resistance. Why is this the case? Thanks for any insight.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Where did you read that the "The theoretical maximum efficiency of a full-wave rectifier circuit with a resistive load and no smoothing is around 82%."?

How do they calculate it?

Apparently, they are using the phrase "rectification efficiency" in a non-standard way.

A web search turned up this:

http://www.madabout-kitcars.com/kitcar/kb.php?aid=349

Down near the bottom of the page they say "Rectification efficiency measures how efficiently a rectifier converts AC to DC. It is defined as the ratio of the DC output power to AC input power, where DC output power is a product of the average current and voltage. ", but then they give a calculation for efficiency "A simpler way to calculate efficiency is with V_{DC}^2over V_{AC}^2." which is incorrect.

Then they say "Without smoothing, full-wave rectifiers have 8overpi^2 or 81% efficiency.", which is a number close to your 82%, but isn't the ration of output power over input power.

Here's another web page that makes the same calculation:
http://www.indiastudychannel.com/projects/8-Full-Wave-Bridge-Rectifier.aspx

And, here I see this same calculation:

http://engineering.wikia.com/wiki/Rectifier

I think they are using the word "efficiency" when they should use "effectiveness" instead. To me efficiency means "output power/input power", but they're not properly calculating that.

On this page:

http://www.toroid.com/custom_transformers/technical_bulletin_1.htm

part way down, you'll find the sentence "It is important to note that better efficiency of voltage conversion (as measured by h) can only be obtained at the cost of higher Form Factor, and conversely lower Form Factor can only be obtained at the cost of poorer DC load regulation." Here they use the word "efficiency" in a non-standard way.

So, I guess the answer to your query is that they are using the word "efficiency" in a different way that you expect.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi bitrex, as pointed out by "the electrictian" this is basically just a misuse of the term efficiency.

The terrm "efficiency" normally means the ratio of output power to input power. Here however they are referring to the ratio of DC output power to total output power. Let me sumarize the situation for an ideal FW rectifier.

Pout = Pin (100% efficiency)

But the output power can be split up into two components, one a smooth DC and the other one zero mean AC.

Pout = P_out_DC + P_out_AC (Output is the sum of a DC and an AC component).

The relative power in the DC component is 81% and the relative power in the AC component is 19%. So no power is lost, we simply have,

Pin (100%) = Pout (100%) = Pout_DC + Pout_AC (81% + 19%)

Hope that helps.
 
In general, the rectification power loss goes into the voltage drop across the diode rectifiers. For a typical silicon diode, the forward voltage drop is ~0.8 volts, so the power loss is 0.6 volts x diode current. If the rectifier is a full wave bridge, two diodes are always conducting the full current, so the power loss is ~1.6 volts x current. If the diodes are going into a capacitive filter, the power loss is even higher, because the current through the diodes is a smaller fraction of the voltage waveform and the peak current is higher, and the voltage drop across the diodes is higher for higher peak currents. Look at Figure 2 for the 1N4004 voltage drop vs current in

http://www.datasheetcatalog.org/datasheet/fairchild/1N4004.pdf

The voltage drop is 0.8 volts for 200 mA. and 1 volt for 2 amps.

Bob S
 
uart said:
Hi bitrex, as pointed out by "the electrictian" this is basically just a misuse of the term efficiency.

The terrm "efficiency" normally means the ratio of output power to input power. Here however they are referring to the ratio of DC output power to total output power. Let me sumarize the situation for an ideal FW rectifier.

Pout = Pin (100% efficiency)

But the output power can be split up into two components, one a smooth DC and the other one zero mean AC.

Pout = P_out_DC + P_out_AC (Output is the sum of a DC and an AC component).

The relative power in the DC component is 81% and the relative power in the AC component is 19%. So no power is lost, we simply have,

Pin (100%) = Pout (100%) = Pout_DC + Pout_AC (81% + 19%)

Hope that helps.

Well, that explains it. However, the various sources I linked to have it wrong. For example, the wiki link:

http://engineering.wikia.com/wiki/Rectifier

"Rectification efficiency measures how efficiently a rectifier converts AC to DC. It is defined as the ratio of the DC output power to AC input power..."

They should have said something like:

"Rectification efficiency measures how efficiently a rectifier converts AC to DC. It is defined as the ratio of the DC output power to AC output power..."

But, even then, to get the numbers the OP refers to, and that you got in your example, they should say:

"Rectification efficiency measures how efficiently a rectifier converts AC to DC. It is defined as the ratio of the DC output power to total output power (DC + AC)..."

Further, I would choose to call it "rectification effectiveness". I think that using the word "efficiency" is likely to confuse the reader, as it did the OP.
 
The Electrician said:
But, even then, to get the numbers the OP refers to, and that you got in your example, they should say:

"Rectification efficiency measures how efficiently a rectifier converts AC to DC. It is defined as the ratio of the DC output power to total output power (DC + AC)..."

Further, I would choose to call it "rectification effectiveness". I think that using the word "efficiency" is likely to confuse the reader, as it did the OP.

Yes I agree, that's how they should have defined it.
 
Thank you for the clarification, everyone!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K