Capacitance and distance between plates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between capacitance and the distance between capacitor plates, specifically using the formula C = ε₀ A / d. Participants confirm that capacitance (C) is inversely proportional to the distance (d) between plates, suggesting that reducing the distance results in capacitance being one third of its original value. Additionally, the work done (W) in a capacitor is derived from the energy equation W = 0.5 CV², leading to the conclusion that energy can also be expressed as W = 0.5 Q²/C, where Q is the charge.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of capacitance and its formula C = ε₀ A / d
  • Familiarity with the relationship between charge (Q), voltage (V), and capacitance (C)
  • Knowledge of work-energy principles, specifically W = Fd
  • Ability to integrate basic physics equations related to energy in capacitors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the energy stored in a capacitor using W = 0.5 CV²
  • Explore the implications of changing plate distance on capacitance in practical applications
  • Learn about the role of dielectric materials in capacitance and energy storage
  • Investigate the relationship between electric fields and capacitance in parallel plate capacitors
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of capacitors and energy storage in electrical circuits.

soopo
Messages
222
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The question is at
http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/175564/capacitance.JPG


Homework Equations


Q = CV
C = \epsilon_{0} A / d

The Attempt at a Solution



The right solution is Q^2 / C that is (h).

I know that C is proportional to the inverse of the distance between plates.
Thus, I suggests that the capacitance should one third of the original value.

The other problem is to have a relation between capacitance and work.
I know W=Fd, where we get a relation to capacitance by d.
This suggests me that the work should one third of the work done with the initial distance between plates in the capacitor.

How would you solve the problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi soopo! :smile:
soopo said:
I know that C is proportional to the inverse of the distance between plates.
Thus, I suggests that the capacitance should one third of the original value.

Yes, that's right! :smile:
The other problem is to have a relation between capacitance and work.
I know W=Fd …

You're making it very complicated :redface:

work done is energy …

the https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=75" getting from one state to another is the difference in energy between them (in a conservative system)

So, although, as you say, work done = ∫force.distance (= ∫charge.voltage), it's much easier to use the standard energy equation for a https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=112", which is … ? :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tiny-tim said:
Hi soopo! :smile:Yes, that's right! :smile:You're making it very complicated :redface:

work done is energy …

the https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=75" getting from one state to another is the difference in energy between them (in a conservative system)

So, although, as you say, work done = ∫force.distance (= ∫charge.voltage), it's much easier to use the standard energy equation for a https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=112", which is … ? :smile:

The equation seems to be

W = .5 CV^2

It seems to be obtained by integrating CV with respect to V.
The problem is now to know the upper and lower bounds for the voltage in the integral.
I suggest that the upper one is infinity and the lower one is zero.

If the formula is right, then
V^2 = 2Q / C

However, I cannot see how to get the result.
This suggests me that the equation for the work done in the capacitor is not correct.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi soopo! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
soopo said:
The equation seems to be

W = .5 CV^2

It seems to be obtained by integrating CV with respect to V.

(whyever are you using W for energy? :confused:)

No, it's obtained either by integrating ∫(1/2)QEdx or ∫QVdQ … see the PF Library on https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=112"

Anyway, since Q = CV, the energy can also be written .5 Q2/C, which should give you the result almost immediately. :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tiny-tim said:
Hi soopo! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)


(whyever are you using W for energy? :confused:)

No, it's obtained either by integrating ∫(1/2)QEdx or ∫QVdQ … see the PF Library on https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=112"

Anyway, since Q = CV, the energy can also be written .5 Q2/C, which should give you the result almost immediately. :wink:


Thank you for your answers!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
675
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K