Why Is the Electric Field Not Multiplied by 2 in This Capacitor Calculation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the calculation of capacitance for a parallel-plate capacitor, specifically addressing the electric field's role in determining potential difference. The electric field is defined as \(\frac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon}\), leading to a potential \(V = \frac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon}d\). The confusion arises from the application of superposition in textbooks, which does not require dividing the electric field by 2 when considering the potential between two plates. The final understanding emphasizes that the electric field is influenced by the configuration of the capacitor, particularly when comparing it to cylindrical geometries.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and potential difference
  • Familiarity with capacitance concepts and formulas
  • Knowledge of Gaussian surfaces in electrostatics
  • Basic principles of superposition in electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of capacitance for parallel-plate capacitors
  • Explore the concept of electric field superposition in different geometries
  • Learn about Gaussian surfaces and their applications in electrostatics
  • Investigate the differences between cylindrical and parallel-plate capacitor configurations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators explaining capacitor concepts, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of electric fields and capacitance calculations.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Capacitance and electric fields

Homework Statement


I want to find the capacitance of a parallel-plate capacitor consisting of two metal surfaces og area A held a distance d apart.

First I find the electric field, which I know is \frac{\sigma }{{2\varepsilon }}. Then I use that the potential is the line integral from minus-charge plate to positive-charge plate of electric field, so

V = \frac{\sigma }{{2\varepsilon }}d

But in my book they do not divide by 2. This is because they have used superposition, which is OK - I agree with that.

Next, we consider the following:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/capcyl.html#c2

Here they have used the electric field for |one| cylinder, they have not used superposition. This I do not agree with - we are still between the cylinders, so why do we not multiply by 2 here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh, right.. because the charge inside our gaussian surface is the charge coming from the "inside-cylinder"...

I get it now. Thanks
 
Actually the electric field is not between two cylinders, but it is in between a cylinder and a pipe, so it is not the same case as two parallel capacitors.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K