Capacitance Questions: Troubleshooting Parallel Plate Capacitors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marquize10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around troubleshooting capacitance measurements in parallel plate capacitors using the AMS pcap02 device. The user reports that when the ground is disconnected, the device becomes sensitive to external influences, suggesting potential parasitic capacitance effects. Participants suggest checking the device's resolution limit, as the measured capacitance values are very low, potentially below the device's capability to accurately measure. It is emphasized that the connection layout and the presence of stray capacitance can significantly affect readings, especially at low capacitance levels. Understanding the device's specifications and proper measurement techniques is crucial for obtaining reliable results.
  • #31
sysprog said:
we say that the speed of light is 1 something?.
In the 'natural system', c would to be dimensionless. The resulting values of distance and time would have suitably adjusted units so that the ratio would be 1. Once you choose the second (say, the units of distance would end up as 3e8 m so that c would measure as 1. (Other combinations are available)
 
  • Informative
Likes sysprog
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
sysprog said:
Please remember that 2019 is the year in which they/we screwed around with the units by assigning the speed of light/causation to be 1 -- oh and yeah, that speed is still somewhere around 286,000 miles per second -- where does that information go when we say that the speed of light is 1 something?.
WOW! Someone really screwed around with something since the last I knew the speed of light in a vacuum was 186,282 miles per second.
 
  • #33
sysprog said:
that speed is still somewhere around 286,000 miles per second
I guess the mile can be defined in terms of the distance traveled by light in 1s but I think it is actually defined as 1,609.344 metres. The last time I used the 186k miles per second value in anger was in secondary School in the early 60s. The mile is a quaint unit but we still use it (UK) when driving around but the fuel consumption figures for new cars don't mention miles. I let the car information display tell me the mpg but does anyone really believe that?
 
  • #34
Averagesupernova said:
WOW! Someone really screwed around with something since the last I knew the speed of light in a vacuum was 186,282 miles per second.
You're right -- my mistake.
sophiecentaur said:
I guess the mile can be defined in terms of the distance traveled by light in 1s but I think it is actually defined as 1,609.344 metres. The last time I used the 186k miles per second value in anger was in secondary School in the early 60s. The mile is a quaint unit but we still use it (UK) when driving around but the fuel consumption figures for new cars don't mention miles. I let the car information display tell me the mpg but does anyone really believe that?
When I was in school the mile was defined as 5280 feet.
 
  • #35
sysprog said:
When I was in school the mile was defined as 5280 feet.
Not "defined" in the strict sense - there are ratios between all length measurements. In the end, you need to start with one single length - in this case, afaik, the metre is the prime unit of length and it is defined in terms of the second and c. All the others follow that.
 
  • Like
Likes sysprog

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
499
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K