Capacitive Reactance: Calculate Xc & V=I*Xc

  • Thread starter Devil Moo
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Reactance
In summary, a pure capacitor C in an a.c. circuit has a voltage Vc of V0 * sin(w*t) and a charge Q of C * V0 * sin(w*t). The current I is the derivative of Q with respect to time, giving wCV0 sin(wt) as the expression for I. The relationship V = I * Xc is often used, with Xc being 1/(wC), but it is not a must to include complex numbers. The derivative of sin is cos, so it is not necessary to introduce imaginary roots. However, if considering the phase difference between voltage and current, it may be helpful to use complex numbers and the expression V = I * Xc * tan(w
  • #1
Devil Moo
44
1
Hi,

A pure capacitor C is in an a.c. circuit.

Vc = V0 * sin(w*t)
Q = C * Vc
= C * V0 * sin(w*t)
I = dQ/dt
= wCV0 sin(wt)
then I0 = wCV0
Xc = V0 / I0 = 1/(wC)

So why people would say V = I * Xc?

Is it a must to include complex number?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The derivative of sin is cos.

You don't need complex numbers.
 
  • #3
Whoops!
I = I0 cos(wt)
Then V = I * Xc * tan(wt)
not V = I * Xc
 
  • #4
The relationship V=I*Xc (with real numbers) is between the amplitudes or rms values and not between instantaneous values.
Otherwise you need to consider Xc as a complex number, to take into account the phase difference between v and i.
 
  • #5
But why do we introduce imaginary root in it?
Is it used to describe the phase based on the e^(i*theta)?
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top