Capacitor: surface charge densities

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the surface charge densities and electric fields of a capacitor with a top plate charged with 2Q and a bottom plate charged with -Q. The correct surface charge densities are determined to be +1/2, +3/2, -3/2, and +1/2 for the respective surfaces. The electric fields are derived using Gauss's Law and the method of superposition, leading to expressions for the electric fields in various regions around the capacitor. The participants confirm the importance of understanding the relationship between surface charge density and electric field strength, specifically that σ = ε0E.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of capacitor theory and electric fields
  • Familiarity with Gauss's Law
  • Knowledge of surface charge density calculations
  • Proficiency in applying the method of superposition in electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from surface charge densities using Gauss's Law
  • Explore the method of superposition in electrostatics for complex charge distributions
  • Learn about the implications of surface charge density on capacitor performance
  • Investigate the effects of varying plate separations on electric field strength in capacitors
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, electrical engineers, and anyone involved in designing or analyzing capacitors and their electric fields.

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Given a capacitor, top plate with charge 2Q, bottom plate -Q: Find surface charge densities of all four surfaces and E-fields everywhere.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



34eaqkx.png


I start off with the general case of top plate having charge Q1, bottom plate Q2. Inner surfaces of capacitor get their charge densities distorted more. (Zero distortion when plates are very far away; equal charge distributed on inner and outer surfaces)

Inner and outer top surfaces charge density distorted by sigma, while bottom inner and outer surfaces distorted by gamma\sigma_1 = \frac{Q_1}{2A} - \delta, E_1 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(\frac{Q_1}{2A} - \delta)
\sigma_2 = \frac{Q_1}{2A} + \delta, E_2 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(\frac{Q1}{2A} + \delta)
\sigma_3 = -\frac{Q_2}{2A} - \gamma, E_3 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(-\frac{Q2}{2A} - \gamma)
\sigma_4 = -\frac{Q_2}{2A} + \gamma, E_4 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(-\frac{Q2}{2A} + \gamma)

Electric fields at regions

E_A = -E_1 - E_2 + E_3 + E_4 = \frac {1}{2\epsilon_0}(-\frac{Q_1}{A}-\frac{Q_2}{A})
E_B = E_1 - E_2 + E_3 + E_4 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(-2\delta -\frac{Q_2}{A}) = 0
E_C = E_1 + E_2 + E_3 + E_4 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(\frac{Q_1}{A}-\frac{Q_2}{A})
E_D = E_1 + E_2 -E_3 + E_4 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(\frac{Q_1}{A} + 2\gamma) = 0
E_E = E_1 + E_2 - E_3 - E_4 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(\frac{Q_1}{A} + \frac{Q_2}{A})

Answers
\sigma_1 = \frac{Q}{2A}, E_1 = \frac{Q}{4A\epsilon_0}
\sigma_2 = \frac{3Q}{2A}, E_2 = \frac{3Q}{4A\epsilon_0}
\sigma_3 = \frac{3Q}{2A}, E_3 = \frac{3Q}{4A\epsilon_0}
\sigma_4 = \frac{-Q}{2A}, E_4 = \frac{-Q}{4A\epsilon_0}

These answers are wrong, as the inner plates should have equal but opposite charge densities, the outer plates will have exactly same charge densities. I checked similar questions online.

I'm guesssing the charge densities should be (from top to bottom surfaces): +1/2, +3/2, -3/2, +1/2.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
unscientific said:

Homework Statement



Given a capacitor, top plate with charge 2Q, bottom plate -Q: Find surface charge densities of all four surfaces and E-fields everywhere.I'm guesssing the charge densities should be (from top to bottom surfaces): +1/2, +3/2, -3/2, +1/2.

Your guess is correct, but I can not follow your derivation. The electric field of a surface charge on a metal surface is σ/ε0 outward, not the half.

Imagine you have 2Q charge arranged evenly along a plane at the position of the upper plate of the capacitor, and -Q charge along a plane at he position of the bottom plate. Determine the electric field above the planes, between them and below.

If you know the electric fields you can place the plates of the capacitor back. You know that the surface charge density on a metal surface is equal to ε0E. Knowing E, you can determine the surface charge densities at both sides of both capacitor plates.
 
ehild said:
Your guess is correct, but I can not follow your derivation. The electric field of a surface charge on a metal surface is σ/ε0 outward, not the half.

Imagine you have 2Q charge arranged evenly along a plane at the position of the upper plate of the capacitor, and -Q charge along a plane at he position of the bottom plate. Determine the electric field above the planes, between them and below.

If you know the electric fields you can place the plates of the capacitor back. You know that the surface charge density on a metal surface is equal to ε0E. Knowing E, you can determine the surface charge densities at both sides of both capacitor plates.

I tried that, didn't work:

Gauss's Law on inner plates:
\frac{\sigma_2}{2\epsilon_0} = \frac{-\sigma_3}{2\epsilon_0}

Conservation of Charge on plates:
A(\sigma_1 + \sigma_2) = 2Q
A(\sigma_3 + \sigma_4) = -QI only end up with 3 equations..
 
Last edited:
ehild said:
Your guess is correct, but I can not follow your derivation. The electric field of a surface charge on a metal surface is σ/ε0 outward, not the half.

Imagine you have 2Q charge arranged evenly along a plane at the position of the upper plate of the capacitor, and -Q charge along a plane at he position of the bottom plate. Determine the electric field above the planes, between them and below.

If you know the electric fields you can place the plates of the capacitor back. You know that the surface charge density on a metal surface is equal to ε0E. Knowing E, you can determine the surface charge densities at both sides of both capacitor plates.

I have come up with another equation, by trial and error -- Consider the field inside the top plate = 0

Case 1: top outer surface (-), bottom outer surface (+)
\sigma_1 - \sigma_2 - \sigma_3 -\sigma_4 = 0

Case 2: top outer surface (+), bottom outer surface (-)
\sigma_1 - \sigma_2 - \sigma_3 -\sigma_4 = 0

Case 3: top outer surface (+), bottom outer surface (+)
\sigma_1 - \sigma_2 - \sigma_3 -\sigma_4 = 0

Case 4: top outer surface (-), bottom outer surface (-)
\sigma_1 - \sigma_2 - \sigma_3 -\sigma_4 = 0

They all give the same relation. This equation with the three above, we can solve for them.
 
Try to work with the field lines. Every positive charge q is the source of q/ε0 field lines, and every negative, -q charge is the sink of q/ε0 field lines.

Imagine two planar arrangement of charges, 2Q on the upper plane and -Q on the bottom plane. Apply the method of superposition. Both planes contribute to the field in every domain A, B ,C and the net field is the sum of these contributions.
You have 2Q/ε0 field lines, emerging from the upper plane symmetrically at both sides of the plane, both upward and downward. Take upward positive. The downward field lines penetrate to both B and C. So the upper plane contributes to the electric field in domain A with Q/(Aε0) , and with -Q/(Aε0) between the planes (B) and also in domain C.
The other, negative plane of charges contributes to the field with Q/(2Aε0) in domain C, and with -Q/(2Aε0) in both B and A.

Adding these contributions, you get:

EA=Q/(Aε0)-Q/(2Aε0)=1/2 Q/(Aε0)

EB=-Q/(Aε0)-Q/(2Aε0)=-3/2 Q/(Aε0)

EC...

Can you proceed?

Now you place the metal plates in the position of the planes - it does not change the fields in A, B, C. The magnitude of the surface charge density is |E|ε0 on each surfaces.

ehild
 

Attachments

  • fieldlines.JPG
    fieldlines.JPG
    12.7 KB · Views: 674
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
ehild said:
Try to work with the field lines. Every positive charge q is the source of q/ε0 field lines, and every negative, -q charge is the sink of q/ε0 field lines.

Imagine two planar arrangement of charges, 2Q on the upper plane and -Q on the bottom plane. Apply the method of superposition. Both planes contribute to the field in every domain A, B ,C and the net field is the sum of these contributions.
You have 2Q/ε0 field lines, emerging from the upper plane symmetrically at both sides of the plane, both upward and downward. Take upward positive. The downward field lines penetrate to both B and C. So the upper plane contributes to the electric field in domain A with Q/(Aε0) , and with -Q/(Aε0) between the planes (B) and also in domain C.
The other, negative plane of charges contributes to the field with Q/(2Aε0) in domain C, and with -Q/(2Aε0) in both B and A.

Adding these contributions, you get:

EA=Q/(Aε0)-Q/(2Aε0)=1/2 Q/(Aε0)

EB=-Q/(Aε0)-Q/(2Aε0)=-3/2 Q/(Aε0)

EC...

Can you proceed?

Now you place the metal plates in the position of the planes - it does not change the fields in A, B, C. The magnitude of the surface charge density is |E|ε0 on each surfaces.

ehild

I have solved it using the four equations above, thank you very much for your help too!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K