Capillary action for non-polar substances?

AI Thread Summary
Capillary action is typically associated with polar substances, but observations show non-polar substances like ether can also exhibit this phenomenon, albeit more slowly than water. The discussion highlights that intermolecular forces, including dipole-dipole interactions and London dispersion forces, play a role in capillary action, challenging the notion that only polar substances can participate. The complexity of adhesion and wetting is emphasized, with references to historical and contemporary theories that attempt to explain these processes. Despite extensive literature on the subject, conclusive models remain elusive, particularly for specific cases like long-chain polymers. The ongoing challenges in understanding capillary action and wetting phenomena indicate that the field continues to evolve.
Archosaur
Messages
333
Reaction score
4
I thought I understood capillary action, but according to my understanding, non-polar substances shouldn't undergo capillary action. Today in lab, we were working with ether, which is non-polar, and I noticed it climbed up a paper towel. It was slower than water, but still... what intermolecular forces pulled the ether up the towel?

Or is my understanding of capillary action wrong? Are intermolecular forces necessary? They must be!
 
Science news on Phys.org
Polarity is not a binary property. Diethyl/methyl ether is actually fairly polar. So to begin with: Dipole-dipole interactions. Also, London forces.

If there were no (or little) intermolecular forces, it wouldn't be a liquid.
 
Archosaur said:
I thought I understood capillary action, but according to my understanding, non-polar substances shouldn't undergo capillary action.

Why do/did you think this?
 
Aren't hydrogen bonds / dipole-dipole forces responsible for capillary action?
 
Ah. Actually, we do not yet have a microscopic theory for adhesion, adsorption, or wetting. Girifalco and Good did some seminal work in the late 1950's using the Lewis acid-base formalism, but Lee (in "Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion", VSP 1993) identified two main theoretical formalisms (so-called Surface Tension Component and Equation of State), and identified 6 molecular interactions (electrostatic, charge transfer, exchange-respulsion, polarization, dispersion, coupling) that go into the different models. It's been a long time since I got into detail about this; the field has hopefully advanced in the meantime.

There's a huge amount of literature on this subject; none of it is conclusive and none of it is valid for more than a few very special cases- long chain polymers, for example.

Even worse, the problem of wetting leads to an irreducible singularity at the (moving) contact line). This problem has not been resolved. Shikhmurzaev's "Capillary flows with forming interfaces" is a good summary of the current state of the art regarding this problem.
 
Thread 'Simple math model for a Particle Image Velocimetry system'
Hello togehter, I am new to this forum and hope this post followed all the guidelines here (I tried to summarized my issue as clean as possible, two pictures are attached). I would appreciate every help: I am doing research on a Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) system. For this I want to set a simple math model for the system. I hope you can help me out. Regarding this I have 2 main Questions. 1. I am trying to find a math model which is describing what is happening in a simple Particle...
I would like to use a pentaprism with some amount of magnification. The pentaprism will be used to reflect a real image at 90 degrees angle but I also want the reflected image to appear larger. The distance between the prism and the real image is about 70cm. The pentaprism has two reflecting sides (surfaces) with mirrored coating and two refracting sides. I understand that one of the four sides needs to be curved (spherical curvature) to achieve the magnification effect. But which of the...
Back
Top