Car turning on an unbanked (level) surface

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bipolarity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Surface Turning
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanics of a car turning on an unbanked (level) surface, specifically focusing on the relationship between frictional force and centripetal force during the turn. Participants explore the dynamics of forces acting on the car and the role of friction in maintaining circular motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the frictional force equals the centripetal force, suggesting that friction should be opposite to the velocity and thus normal to the centripetal force.
  • Another participant explains that the frictional force acts between the tire patch and the road, resisting the car's tendency to move in a straight line, but does not clarify the relationship with centripetal force.
  • There is a reiteration of the confusion regarding the direction of the frictional force in relation to tangential velocity and centripetal acceleration.
  • A participant asserts that the tire patch is momentarily stationary relative to the road, implying that the frictional force does not oppose tangential velocity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between frictional force and centripetal force, with no consensus reached on the mechanics involved in the turning motion of the car.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the forces at play, including the assumptions about the tire's contact with the road and the conditions under which the car is turning without sliding.

Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2
I've been trying to understand this:
http://www.batesville.k12.in.us/physics/phynet/mechanics/circular motion/an_unbanked_turn.htm

What I can't understand is why the frictional force equals the centripetal force. As the car turns, the frictional force should be opposite (antiparallel) to its velocity, and thus normal to the centripetal force, since the centripetal force is normal to the velocity.

What am I missing here? All help is appreciated thanks!

BiP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bipolarity said:
I've been trying to understand this:
http://www.batesville.k12.in.us/physics/phynet/mechanics/circular motion/an_unbanked_turn.htm

What I can't understand is why the frictional force equals the centripetal force. As the car turns, the frictional force should be opposite (antiparallel) to its velocity, and thus normal to the centripetal force, since the centripetal force is normal to the velocity.

What am I missing here? All help is appreciated thanks!

BiP

The frictional force is acting between the road surface and the tire patch that is in contact with the road. That tire contact patch is (as long as the car is not sliding) at rest relative to the road, and no matter which direction you try to push it, the frictional force will resist. The car wants to go in a straight line, pulling the tire patch towards the outside of curve, and the frictional force between tire patch and road is resisting.

You might also want to read #21 in this thread. https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=3984064&highlight=Tire#post3984064
 
Last edited:
Nugatory said:
The frictional force is acting between the road surface and the tire patch that is in contact with the road. That tire contact patch is (as long as the car is not sliding) at rest relative to the road, and no matter which direction you try to push it, the frictional force will resist. The car wants to go in a straight line, pulling the tire patch towards the outside of curve, and the frictional force between tire patch and road is resisting.

If the frictional force is opposite the (tangential velocity), it should be normal to the centripetal acceleration. I don't understand why this is not so.

BiP
 
Bipolarity said:
If the frictional force is opposite the (tangential velocity), it should be normal to the centripetal acceleration. I don't understand why this is not so.

BiP

It's not opposite to the tangential velocity, because there is no tangential (or radial) velocity to be opposite to - the bit of tire that is touching the road is momentarily stationary.

I edited my first response above to add a pointer to an older thread on this topic:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=3984064&highlight=Tire#post3984064
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K