Cartesian and polar coordinate in Simple pendulum, Euler-Lagrange

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the application of the Euler-Lagrange equation to a simple pendulum using both Cartesian and polar coordinates. It highlights that substituting different coordinate systems simultaneously leads to incorrect results, as the pendulum has only one degree of freedom. The Lagrangian must be expressed in terms of a single independent variable, either θ, x, or y, to maintain consistency. The conversation emphasizes the importance of adhering to the constraints of degrees of freedom when applying Lagrangian mechanics. Ultimately, the pendulum's dynamics can only be accurately described using one coordinate system at a time.
Father_Ing
Messages
33
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Find the equation of motion of a simple pendulum.
Relevant Equations
L = T-V
Simple-Pendulum-Labeled-Diagram.png

$$L = \frac {mv^2}{2} - mgy$$
It is clear that ##\dot{x}=\dot{\theta}L## and ##y=-Lcos \theta##. After substituting these two equations to Lagrange equation, we will get the answer by simply using this equation: $$\frac {d} {dt} \frac {∂L}{∂\dot{\theta}} - \frac {∂L}{∂\theta }= 0$$

But, What if we only substitute ##\dot{x}=\dot{\theta}L## to the Lagrange?
$$L = \frac {mL^2 \dot{\theta}^2}{2} - mgy$$
Then:
$$\frac {d} {dt} \frac {∂L}{∂\dot{\theta}} - \frac {∂L}{∂\theta }= 0$$ $$\frac {d} {dt} \frac {∂L}{∂\dot{y}} - \frac {∂L}{∂y }= 0$$
So, We get : $$mL^2 \ddot{\theta} = 0$$

But, this answer definitely does not make any sense. Is this caused by using two different types of coordinate system at the same time?
If yes, then why is this prohibited?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Father_Ing said:
But, this answer definitely does not make any sense. Is this caused by using two different types of coordinate system at the same time?
If yes, then why is this prohibited?
The pendulum has only one degree of freedom (independent variable), which is either ##\theta## or ##x## or ##y##.

What you have described is a different system where ##y## and ##\theta## are separate degrees of freedom. PS Although it may not make much physical sense, as there is no KE associated with movement in the ##y## direction.
 
PeroK said:
The pendulum has only one degree of freedom (independent variable), which is either θ or x or y.
But, all three of them depends on time (because if it is not, I don't think we can differentiate it with respect to time).
 
If your system has ##n## degrees of freedom, then the Euler-Lagrange equations in the form you quote (known as the "second kind") require that the Lagrangian is expressed using ##n## independent generalised coordinates. Your pendulum has only one degree of freedom, so you must express ##L## in terms of either ##\theta##, or ##y##, or ##x##, or some other coordinate, but not any more than one of them!

If the number of coordinates ##\tilde{n}## exceeds the number of degrees of freedom ##n##, then given ##\tilde{n}-n## holonomic constraint equations expressing the dependencies of these coordinates on each other you can:
1. use the constraint equations to eliminate ##\tilde{n} - n## of these coordinates and get an independent set.
2. or use Lagrange multipliers and Lagrange's equations of the "first kind".
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and PeroK
Father_Ing said:
But, all three of them depends on time (because if it is not, I don't think we can differentiate it with respect to time).
I can't see the relevance of that. A simple pendulum has one degree of freedom. Full stop.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top