Cartesian and polar coordinate in Simple pendulum, Euler-Lagrange

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the Euler-Lagrange equations to a simple pendulum system, emphasizing the importance of using a single coordinate system. The Lagrangian is expressed as $$L = \frac {mL^2 \dot{\theta}^2}{2} - mgy$$, leading to the equation $$mL^2 \ddot{\theta} = 0$$ when substituting for the angular velocity. The participants conclude that using multiple coordinate systems simultaneously is incorrect due to the pendulum's single degree of freedom, which must be represented by either $$\theta$$, $$x$$, or $$y$$, but not more than one.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with Euler-Lagrange equations
  • Knowledge of degrees of freedom in mechanical systems
  • Basic concepts of coordinate transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Euler-Lagrange equations in various mechanical systems
  • Learn about holonomic constraints and their role in Lagrangian mechanics
  • Explore the implications of degrees of freedom in complex mechanical systems
  • Investigate the use of Lagrange multipliers in constrained optimization problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, as well as engineers and researchers working on dynamic systems and simulations.

Father_Ing
Messages
33
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Find the equation of motion of a simple pendulum.
Relevant Equations
L = T-V
Simple-Pendulum-Labeled-Diagram.png

$$L = \frac {mv^2}{2} - mgy$$
It is clear that ##\dot{x}=\dot{\theta}L## and ##y=-Lcos \theta##. After substituting these two equations to Lagrange equation, we will get the answer by simply using this equation: $$\frac {d} {dt} \frac {∂L}{∂\dot{\theta}} - \frac {∂L}{∂\theta }= 0$$

But, What if we only substitute ##\dot{x}=\dot{\theta}L## to the Lagrange?
$$L = \frac {mL^2 \dot{\theta}^2}{2} - mgy$$
Then:
$$\frac {d} {dt} \frac {∂L}{∂\dot{\theta}} - \frac {∂L}{∂\theta }= 0$$ $$\frac {d} {dt} \frac {∂L}{∂\dot{y}} - \frac {∂L}{∂y }= 0$$
So, We get : $$mL^2 \ddot{\theta} = 0$$

But, this answer definitely does not make any sense. Is this caused by using two different types of coordinate system at the same time?
If yes, then why is this prohibited?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Father_Ing said:
But, this answer definitely does not make any sense. Is this caused by using two different types of coordinate system at the same time?
If yes, then why is this prohibited?
The pendulum has only one degree of freedom (independent variable), which is either ##\theta## or ##x## or ##y##.

What you have described is a different system where ##y## and ##\theta## are separate degrees of freedom. PS Although it may not make much physical sense, as there is no KE associated with movement in the ##y## direction.
 
PeroK said:
The pendulum has only one degree of freedom (independent variable), which is either θ or x or y.
But, all three of them depends on time (because if it is not, I don't think we can differentiate it with respect to time).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
If your system has ##n## degrees of freedom, then the Euler-Lagrange equations in the form you quote (known as the "second kind") require that the Lagrangian is expressed using ##n## independent generalised coordinates. Your pendulum has only one degree of freedom, so you must express ##L## in terms of either ##\theta##, or ##y##, or ##x##, or some other coordinate, but not any more than one of them!

If the number of coordinates ##\tilde{n}## exceeds the number of degrees of freedom ##n##, then given ##\tilde{n}-n## holonomic constraint equations expressing the dependencies of these coordinates on each other you can:
1. use the constraint equations to eliminate ##\tilde{n} - n## of these coordinates and get an independent set.
2. or use Lagrange multipliers and Lagrange's equations of the "first kind".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and PeroK
Father_Ing said:
But, all three of them depends on time (because if it is not, I don't think we can differentiate it with respect to time).
I can't see the relevance of that. A simple pendulum has one degree of freedom. Full stop.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
73
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
894
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K