Catenary - find rope length Maple must be used

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the length of a power line modeled as a catenary, given specific constraints regarding pole height and clearance. The context includes the use of Maple software for numerical solutions and symbolic computations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use Maple's "solve" command and Newton's method to find the parameter 'a' and the length 'L', but encounters issues with undefined values and intersections in their derived equations. They seek clarification on their substitutions and derivations.
  • Another participant expresses a similar problem but lacks access to Maple, prompting a request for alternative methods to solve the problem.
  • One participant comments on the lack of responses, suggesting the problem may be challenging for others as well.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different aspects of the problem. The original poster is seeking expert advice on their approach, while another participant is looking for alternative methods due to software limitations. There is no consensus or resolution yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under specific constraints, including the need for numerical accuracy and the use of Maple for computations. The original poster has derived equations based on given conditions but is uncertain about their correctness.

bur7ama1989
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Utilities companies usually use a separation between poles about 340 feet. These poles are 34 feet tall and due to restrictions due to maximum height of trucks using interstates and state routes, the minimum clearance is 20 feet (and also considering the increase of sag of the cable due to expansion in the summer time). Compute the required length of the power line between poles.

Note 1: From Eq. (1) for y(170)=34 and y(0)=20, it can be solved (numerically) the parameter a from a single nonlinear equation. Use Newton method or any "Find root" instruction to solve this nonlinear equation. The starting guess value a0 for these techniques can be obtained graphically (show this graph). Once the value of parameter a has been found (4 decimal places accuracy), use it in Eq. (4) to find the length of the cable.

Note 2: Derive Eq. (4) from the computation of the integral of the arc length of y(x) in Eq. (1). Compute symbolically this integral to verify the result of Eq. (4).

Homework Equations



(1) y(x) = (a)(cosh(x/a)) + C
(2) a = H/w
(3) cosh(x) = ((e^x) + (e^-x))/2
(4) L = (2a)(sinh(M/a))

The Attempt at a Solution



I attempted using Maple's "solve" command to solve for L, a, and C. Needless to say it did not work.

The answer yielded without evalf() was as follows for a:

a = 28*exp(RootOf(14*_Z*exp(_Z)-85*(exp(_Z))^2+170*exp(_Z)-85))/(exp(RootOf(14*_Z*exp(_Z)-85*(exp(_Z))^2+170*exp(_Z)-85))-1)^2

With the evalf() i yielded:

a = Float(infinity), L = Float(undefined), C = Float(-infinity)

I also substituted as suggested using y(170)=34 and y(0)=20. I solved for "C" in y(170) and yielded:

C= -a*cosh(170/a)+34

I substituted this into y(0) and yielded:

a-a*cosh(170/a)+14 = 0

Now that i have an equation equal to zero with a single variable I can now use Newton's method. So I assigned the new equation to f(a):

f(a) = a-a*cosh(170/a)+14

I next assigned g(a) to the derivative of f(a):

g(a) = 1-cosh((170)/(a))+(170 sinh((170)/(a)))/(a)

I assigned h(a) to Newton's Method. Now the issue is that no matter which value I choose it doesn't seem to work. I graphed the function f(x) and g(x) and it does not seem to intersect with the x-axis whatsoever so I am not quiet sure if I derived the correct equation by my substitution. I would really appreciate some expert advice of which the members on this site have an abundance. Thank for your time. I realize this is a long question, but I don't think the question is simple...in my opinion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have solved the problem, but it makes me feel good to see that a bunch of people viewed the thread and no replies. I assume it was a brain buster for the people who viewed it. Fact remains I couldn't find an exact value, but i achieved the desired decimal place accuracy.
 
Hi,

I have the exact same problem and information with which to work out the length of a catenary. I don't have maple at my disposal!

Can you please advise on how I might solve this problem??

Your help would be much appreciated!
 
buy it, check your college library or computer lab, or download it using torrents
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K