Cauchy Integral Formula - Evaluating Singularities on a Closed Path

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the evaluation of a complex integral using the Cauchy Integral Formula, specifically focusing on singularities within a closed path defined by |z| = 2.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the evaluation of residues at singularities z = 1 and z = -1, while questioning the treatment of the factor (z^2 - 1) in the denominator. There is a discussion about the correct application of the Cauchy Integral Formula and the calculation of residues.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on including necessary factors in the evaluation process. There is an acknowledgment of differing interpretations regarding the calculations, but no explicit consensus has been reached on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through potential misunderstandings about the application of the Cauchy Integral Formula and the evaluation of residues, with some expressing confusion about the calculations involved.

NewtonianAlch
Messages
453
Reaction score
0
Cauchy Integral Formula - Multiple Repeated Poles

Homework Statement



C.I.F is doing my head in.

Evaluate [itex]∫ {\frac {{z}^{2}+1}{ \left( z-3 \right) \left( {z}^{2}-1 \right) }}[/itex]

For the closed path |z| = 2



The Attempt at a Solution



This is a circle of radius 2, with singularities [itex]z = 3, z = -1, z = 1[/itex]

Since z = 3 falls outside the circle, we focus on the two singularities inside.

Since the C.I.F is [itex]2\,i\pi \,f \left( z_{{0}} \right)[/itex]

f(z) here would be [itex]{\frac {{z}^{2}+1}{z-3}}[/itex]

Substituting z = 1, and z = -1

We get -1 and -1/2 from f(z)

So that is -2Pi*i -Pi*i = -3Pi*i

However the answer given is -i*Pi/2

I have been stuck on this for a while and I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
answer is -i*pi/2.why are you leaving the factor z^2-1 in denominator.at z=1 residue is -1/2 and at -1 it is 1/4 and so the answer.
 
I am sorry, I did not quite understand what you meant. I am not leaving the factor (z^2 - 1) in the denominator.

How did you get those two values (-1/2 and 1/4)?

When z = 1, isn't it (1^2 + 1)/(1 - 3) = 2/-2 = -1 ?

z = -1; (-1)^2 + 1/(-1 -3) = 2/-4 = -1/2
 
I think I see what you mean, I must also include the factor (z -1) and (z + 1) with (z - 3) every time I evaluate at one of the singularity. Now I get that correct answer.

Thank you.
 
congratulations.
 
Lol ^
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K