Cauchy Integral Number 2 (Proof)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the second derivative of an analytic function using the Cauchy Integral Formula. The formula states that if f(z) is analytic within and on a simple closed contour C, then the k-th derivative f^k(z) can be expressed as f^k(z) = k!/(2iπ) ∫_C f(ζ) dζ / (ζ - z)^(k+1). The participants clarify the disappearance of the term 'h' in the calculations and derive the expression for the second derivative, ultimately confirming that the numerator includes a factor of 2 due to the cancellation of terms during differentiation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis, specifically the Cauchy Integral Formula.
  • Familiarity with analytic functions and their derivatives.
  • Knowledge of contour integration techniques.
  • Proficiency in handling limits and the ML Theorem in complex analysis.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Cauchy Integral Formula in detail, focusing on its applications to derivatives.
  • Learn about the ML Theorem and its implications in contour integration.
  • Explore examples of calculating higher-order derivatives using contour integrals.
  • Investigate the properties of analytic functions and their behavior within closed contours.
USEFUL FOR

Students of complex analysis, mathematicians focusing on contour integration, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of the Cauchy Integral Formula and its applications in deriving derivatives of analytic functions.

Milky
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If f(z) is analytic interior to and on a simple closed contour C, then all the derivatives [tex]f^k(z)[/tex] , k=1,2,3... exist in the domain D interior to C, and

[tex]f^k(z)=\frac{k!}{2i\pi}\int_{C}\frac{f(\zeta)d\zeta}{(\zeta-z)^{k+1}}[/tex]
Prove for second derivative.

The Attempt at a Solution


For the first derivative, I would start with
[tex]\frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{h}=\frac{1}{2i\pi}\frac{1}{h}\int_{C}{f(\zeta)(\frac{1}{\zeta-(z+h)}-\frac{1}{\zeta-z})d\zeta[/tex]

=[tex]\frac{1}{2i\pi}}\int_{C}\frac{f(\zeta)d\zeta}{(\zeta-z)(\zeta-(z+h)}[/tex]
(HERE, I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHERE THE H DISAPPEARED TO)
=[tex]\frac{1}{2i\pi}}\int_{C}\frac{f(\zeta)d\zeta}{(\zeta-z)^2}+R[/tex]

where R= [tex]\frac{h}{2i\pi}\int_{C}\frac{f(\zeta)d\zeta}{(\zeta-z)^2(\zeta-z-h)}[/tex]

By the ML Theorem, we end up with the R term, and therefore the whole term going to zero, so that all that is left is:

[tex]\frac{1}{2i\pi}}\int_{C}\frac{f(\zeta)d\zeta}{(\zeta-z)^2}[/tex]

For the second derivative, I would start with
[tex]\frac{f'(z+h)-f'(z)}{h}=\frac{1}{2i\pi}}\int_{C}\frac{f(\zeta)d\zeta}{(\zeta-z)^2(\zeta-z-h)}[/tex]

Again, I get a term R that goes to zero, and am suppose to be left with

[tex]\frac{2}{2i\pi}}\int_{C}\frac{f(\zeta)d\zeta}{(\zeta-z)^3}[/tex]

Where does the two in the numerator come from? I'm confused by the calculations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Milky said:

Homework Statement


If f(z) is analytic interior to and on a simple closed contour C, then all the derivatives [tex]f^k(z)[/tex] , k=1,2,3... exist in the domain D interior to C, and

[tex]f^k(z)=\frac{k!}{2i\pi}\int_{C}\frac{f(\zeta)d\zeta}{(\zeta-z)^{k+1}}[/tex]
Prove for second derivative.

The Attempt at a Solution


For the first derivative, I would start with
[tex]\frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{h}=\frac{1}{2i\pi}\frac{1}{h}\int_{C}{f(\zeta)(\frac{1}{\zeta-(z+h)}-\frac{1}{\zeta-z})d\zeta[/tex]

=[tex]\frac{1}{2i\pi}}\int_{C}\frac{f(\zeta)d\zeta}{(\zeta-z)(\zeta-(z+h)}[/tex]
(HERE, I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHERE THE H DISAPPEARED TO)
First, there was no "H" to disappear! You mean, of course, "h", but you need to be careful about that: in general "H" and "h" may be very different things.

What do you get if you actually do the subtraction? What is
[tex]\frac{1}{\zeta-(z+h)}-\frac{1}{\zeta-z}[/tex]

=[tex]\frac{1}{2i\pi}}\int_{C}\frac{f(\zeta)d\zeta}{(\zeta-z)^2}+R[/tex]

where R= [tex]\frac{h}{2i\pi}\int_{C}\frac{f(\zeta)d\zeta}{(\zeta-z)^2(\zeta-z-h)}[/tex]

By the ML Theorem, we end up with the R term, and therefore the whole term going to zero, so that all that is left is:

[tex]\frac{1}{2i\pi}}\int_{C}\frac{f(\zeta)d\zeta}{(\zeta-z)^2}[/tex]

For the second derivative, I would start with
[tex]\frac{f'(z+h)-f'(z)}{h}=\frac{1}{2i\pi}}\int_{C}\frac{f(\zeta)d\zeta}{(\zeta-z)^2(\zeta-z-h)}[/tex]

Again, I get a term R that goes to zero, and am suppose to be left with

[tex]\frac{2}{2i\pi}}\int_{C}\frac{f(\zeta)d\zeta}{(\zeta-z)^3}[/tex]

Where does the two in the numerator come from? I'm confused by the calculations.
 
Oh! Duh... you get

[tex]\frac{h}{\zeta-(z+h)(\zeta-z)}[/tex]

And that h cancels with the 1/h on the outside.
Thanks!

Does anyone see where the 2! in the numerator of
[tex]\frac{2!}{2i\pi}}\int_{C}\frac{f(\zeta)d\zeta}{(\zeta-z)^3}[/tex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K