Cauchy Product: Exponents or Counters Equal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter morenogabr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cauchy Product
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the Cauchy product theorem to the power series of the functions f(x) = e^x and g(x) = sin(x). It is established that for the Cauchy product to be correctly applied, the powers of x in the summation must be aligned, although the initial summation counters can differ. The user expresses confusion regarding whether to adjust the summation limits when the powers of x are equalized, particularly when transitioning from f(x) starting at 0 and g(x) starting at 1. The correct formulation for the Cauchy product is c_n = ∑(from 0 to ∞) a_k * b_(n-k).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of power series and their convergence.
  • Familiarity with the Cauchy product theorem.
  • Knowledge of functions e^x and sin(x) as power series.
  • Ability to manipulate summation indices in mathematical expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Cauchy product theorem in detail to understand its conditions and applications.
  • Learn about manipulating summation indices to align powers in series.
  • Explore the derivation of power series for e^x and sin(x) to reinforce understanding.
  • Practice applying the Cauchy product theorem with different power series to gain proficiency.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus or series, and anyone interested in the application of the Cauchy product theorem in power series analysis.

morenogabr
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
When attemtpting to find the Cauchy product of two functs f(x) and g(x), which are themselves power series, is it more important to have their respective terms of summation be the same of for the exponent of their respective x variable to be equal? Or must both of these conditions be met? I am in a situation where it seems that shifting the index for f(x) to make x powers equal, makes the initial summation counters not equal. Not sure which of these conditions is needed to apply Cauchy prod theorem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
why not show us what you are attempting, try click on the latex below to see the syntax
f(x) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n x^n

as a general rule I would try & make the summation powers of x equivalent. If the other subscripts are confusing why not try a variable change c_n = b_{n-2} etc.
 
<br /> f(x) = e^x = \\sum_{n=0}^{\\infty} (1/n!)(x^n),<br />
<br /> g(x) = sin(x) = \\sum_{k=0}^{\\infty} ((-1)^k)/(2k+1)! * x^(2k+1) <br />

latex not working? maybe its clear enoug what I am trying to show...

I need to use cauchy product theorem to obtain the first 3 terms of f(x)g(x).
So for g(x) I say m=2k+1, k=(m-1)/2, etc to achieve x^m but then the sum goes from m=1 to inf.
So if I leave x powers equal, the summations start at 0 for f(x) and 1 for g(x). But the theorem only gives
c_n=sum(from 0 to inf) a_(k) * b_(n-k) not sure if this would need to go from 1 to inf in my case or leave as 0?
 
morenogabr said:
<br /> f(x) = e^x = \\sum_{n=0}^{\\infty} (1/n!)(x^n),<br />
<br /> g(x) = sin(x) = \\sum_{k=0}^{\\infty} ((-1)^k)/(2k+1)! * x^(2k+1) <br />

latex not working? maybe its clear enoug what I am trying to show...

I need to use cauchy product theorem to obtain the first 3 terms of f(x)g(x).
So for g(x) I say m=2k+1, k=(m-1)/2, etc to achieve x^m but then the sum goes from m=1 to inf.
So if I leave x powers equal, the summations start at 0 for f(x) and 1 for g(x). But the theorem only gives
c_n=sum(from 0 to inf) a_(k) * b_(n-k) not sure if this would need to go from 1 to inf in my case or leave as 0?

<br /> f(x) = e^x = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}{n!}<br />
<br /> g(x) = sin(x) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^k x^{2k+1}}{(2k+1)!} <br />

Use this format for your latex, it's better.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K