Caunchy's Integral Formula w/ trigonometric pole

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the contour integral of the function \(\frac{2+z}{1-\cos(z)}\) along a circle of radius 1 centered at \(z=6\). The context involves Cauchy's integral formula and the presence of a pole at \(z=2\pi\) within the contour.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the identification of the pole and the implications of using Laurent series for the integrand. There are attempts to express the integrand in a form suitable for applying Cauchy's integral formula, with some participants questioning the utility of the series expansion.

Discussion Status

The discussion has progressed with participants exploring different methods to find the residue at the pole. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of Laurent series and the significance of focusing on specific terms that contribute to the residue. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in the algebraic manipulation required.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the use of Laurent series is not typical in their coursework, leading to some uncertainty about its application in this context. There is also mention of the pole being of second order, which adds to the complexity of finding the residue.

bmanbs2
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve the contour integral
[tex]\int_{\gamma}\frac{2+z}{1-cos\left(z\right)}dz[/tex]
along a counter-clockwise circle of radius 1 centered at z=6

Homework Equations


Cauchy's integral formula
[tex]f\left(z\right)=\frac{1}{i*2\pi}\int_{\gamma}\frac{f\left(w\right)}{w-z}dw[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that the integrand has a pole at 2*pi inside the contour, but since this pole is inside a trig function, I don't know how to isolate it and find an f(z) to use in Cauchy's integral formula. Any tips?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try expanding the integrand as a Laurent series about z=2π.
 
That's not really helping. I can calculate

[PLAIN]http://www.sharpermath.com/cgi/mimetex.cgi?\frac{1+z}{1-cos(z)}%20=%20\frac{1+z}{(z-2pi)[{\frac{(z-2\pi)}{2!}-\frac{(z-2\pi)^3}{4!}+\frac{(z-2\pi)^5}{6!}-+...]}

But I guess I don't see how this helps. Sorry we've never used Laurent series to solve path integrals in my class, just found the series themselves.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's a good start. Now write it like this:

[tex]\frac{1+z}{1-\cos z} = \frac{(1+2\pi)+(z-2\pi)}{(z-2\pi)^2\left[\frac{1}{2!}-\frac{(z-2\pi)^2}{4!}+\cdots\right]}[/tex]

Everything's written in terms of (z-2π). You want to get a series in powers of (z-2π).

The reason you want to do this is because the contour integral is equal to [itex]2\pi i[/itex] times the residue at the pole at z=2π, and the residue is the coefficient of the [itex](z-2\pi)^{-1}[/itex] term. Note this means you don't actually have to calculate the whole series but just the one coefficient.
 
OK I understand now, but is there an easier way to find that one coefficient other than lots and lots of algebraic manipulation?
 
You can use whatever method you want to find the residue at the pole. I think using a Laurent series often ends up being the least tedious, but you have to learn how to work with series. The key is to only look at the terms that will give you the one you want. For instance, in this problem, you have

[tex]\frac{1+z}{1-\cos z} = \frac{(1+2\pi)}{(z-2\pi)^2\left[\frac{1}{2!}-\frac{(z-2\pi)^2}{4!}+\cdots\right]} + \frac{(z-2\pi)}{(z-2\pi)^2\left[\frac{1}{2!}-\frac{(z-2\pi)^2}{4!}+\cdots\right]}[/tex]

The whole first term only has even powers of (z-2π), so it can not contribute to the residue. You can completely ignore it. The second term is proportional to (z-2π)-1, so you only need the very first term of the series.

If you have a simple pole, it's sometimes straightforward to just multiply by (z-z0) and take the limit. In this problem, you had a second-order pole, which means you'd have to differentiate, which means differentiating a quotient. I think it ends up being more algebra than figuring out the series.
 
OK I understand what needs to be done and found the answer, so thank you so much. For posterity's sake however, I considered the term,

[tex]\frac{1}{(z-2\pi)\left[\frac{1}{2!}-\frac{(z-2\pi)^2}{4!}+\cdots\right]}[/tex],

Found the closed-form of the series, found its reciprocal, and turned it back into a series. The first term of this series was the term I needed, and the term was 2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K