MHB Cayley table (Asnate's 's question at Yahoo Answers)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Table
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on constructing the Cayley table for the group S={0,1,2,3} under the operation defined as a*b=a+b(mod4). The Cayley table is presented, showing the results of the operation for all pairs of elements in S. The identity element of the group is identified as 0, since it satisfies the condition x*0=0*x for all x in S. Additionally, the inverses for each element are provided, with each element's inverse ensuring that their product yields the identity element. This explanation clarifies the steps involved in constructing the Cayley table, identifying the identity, and finding inverses.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

Let group S={0,1,2,3} and define a*b=a+b(mod4)
Write down the Cayley Table for (S,*)
Find the identity element of S.
Find the inverse of each element of S.

Please explain how and why you do each step. Many Thanks

Here is a link to the question:

Cayley Table construction? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Asnate,

Previous examples: $(a)\;1+2=3$ and the remainder of the euclidean division $3:4$ is $3$ so, $1*2=3$. $(b)\;2+2=4$ and the remainder of the euclidean division $4:4$ is $0$ so, $2*2=0$. $(c)\;2+3=5$ and the remainder of the euclidean division $5:4$ is $1$ so, $2*3=1$ etc. Then, you'll easily verify that the Cayley table is: $$\begin{matrix}{*}&{0}&{1}&2&3\\{0}&{0}&{1}&2&3\\{1}&{1}&{2}&3&0 \\ {2}&{2}&{3}&0&1\\ {3}&{3}&{0}&1&2 \end{matrix}$$ The element $0$ satisfies $x*0=0*x$ for all $x\in S$, hence $0$ is the identity element of $S$.

If $x\in S$, its inverse is the element $x'\in S$ satisfying $x'*x=x*x'=0$. Easily you'll find the inverse of any element of $S$: $$\begin{matrix}{x}&{0}&{1}&2&3\\{x'}&{0}&{3}&2&1 \end{matrix}$$

P.S. I've tried the $\LaTeX$ tabular environment, but it doesn't work.
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K