MHB Cayley table (Asnate's 's question at Yahoo Answers)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Table
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on constructing the Cayley table for the group S={0,1,2,3} under the operation defined as a*b=a+b(mod4). The Cayley table is presented, showing the results of the operation for all pairs of elements in S. The identity element of the group is identified as 0, since it satisfies the condition x*0=0*x for all x in S. Additionally, the inverses for each element are provided, with each element's inverse ensuring that their product yields the identity element. This explanation clarifies the steps involved in constructing the Cayley table, identifying the identity, and finding inverses.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

Let group S={0,1,2,3} and define a*b=a+b(mod4)
Write down the Cayley Table for (S,*)
Find the identity element of S.
Find the inverse of each element of S.

Please explain how and why you do each step. Many Thanks

Here is a link to the question:

Cayley Table construction? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Asnate,

Previous examples: $(a)\;1+2=3$ and the remainder of the euclidean division $3:4$ is $3$ so, $1*2=3$. $(b)\;2+2=4$ and the remainder of the euclidean division $4:4$ is $0$ so, $2*2=0$. $(c)\;2+3=5$ and the remainder of the euclidean division $5:4$ is $1$ so, $2*3=1$ etc. Then, you'll easily verify that the Cayley table is: $$\begin{matrix}{*}&{0}&{1}&2&3\\{0}&{0}&{1}&2&3\\{1}&{1}&{2}&3&0 \\ {2}&{2}&{3}&0&1\\ {3}&{3}&{0}&1&2 \end{matrix}$$ The element $0$ satisfies $x*0=0*x$ for all $x\in S$, hence $0$ is the identity element of $S$.

If $x\in S$, its inverse is the element $x'\in S$ satisfying $x'*x=x*x'=0$. Easily you'll find the inverse of any element of $S$: $$\begin{matrix}{x}&{0}&{1}&2&3\\{x'}&{0}&{3}&2&1 \end{matrix}$$

P.S. I've tried the $\LaTeX$ tabular environment, but it doesn't work.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top