Censorship on Non-Lethal Systems at Universities

  • Thread starter Thread starter OceanWanderer
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the censorship of topics related to non-lethal defensive systems at universities, raising concerns about the limitations placed on exploring such ideas. The original poster questions the moderators' understanding of ongoing research in physics and engineering, arguing that their closed topic did not violate forum rules. There is frustration expressed over perceived disrespect and hostility from other forum members, leading to a decision to leave the community. The conversation also touches on the potential dangers of discussing certain technologies, such as lasers, that can cause serious harm. Ultimately, the thread highlights the tension between academic exploration and forum policies on sensitive subjects.
OceanWanderer
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I was just censored on this forum for exploring ideas relating to reducing violence and promoting non-lethal, defensive systems over deadly protection systems.

Do you all have any idea how many universities are currently working on various non-lethal systems under grant? Are you moderators even in Physics or Engineering departments or aware of the current happenings in them?

My closed topic, https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=3044998#post3044998 , was in good spirit and follows closely with a huge amount of research being done across the country in various universities.

How, in any way, does something that is researched so widely under grant at various universities, violate the TOS of this site?

Combine this senseless censorship with attacks by DanP on the very first thread I replied to and well... you all just lost a new member in the first 4 posts. What a terrible place to ask questions or engage in conversation. People here have no respect for others.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are better channels you can pursue if you need information about shipboard weapons systems. If you really need something to defend your vessel, you should know who to get in touch with.
 
I understand what you're saying. The forum isn't keen on discussing ways to inflict deliberate injury on others. There are liability and legal ramifications to this.

As to the flamers, ignore them. There are lots of males who aren't men in here.

However, you may not realize that your other post involved powers which at every level would have caused permanent eye damage and blindness. I was about to tell you to give up on the concept when the thread was closed. There's no such thing as a "dazzler" that can't put an eye out permanently. IR is far worse, it will cook the cornea in seconds causing perment blindness without the victim being aware until it's too late.

Just carry the gun at sea and hide it on the boat in port. That has to be what everyone else does.

You might use a taser once they're on board, but they'll have guns- and so should you.

Don't bring a knife or a laser to gunfight.
 
OceanWanderer said:
How, in any way, does something that is researched so widely under grant at various universities, violate the TOS of this site?

Drug recipes & explosives are also researched at Universities, but we don't discuss them here as well. That's just the way it is. We don't want some kid to try theses ideas because they look cool. It has nothing to do with you.

Forum rules:

Greg Bernhardt said:
Illegal/Dangerous Activities:
Explicit "how to" discussions of illegal and/or dangerous activities, or posts advocating such activities, are prohibited; such as: how to make explosives, manufacture crack, steal software, hack into the CIA, ...

If you have problems with post by any user, use the Report button.

Edit: I am locking the thread.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Back
Top