Center of mass of composite body

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the center of mass (x-bar, y-bar) of a composite body consisting of a triangle, square, and circle. Participants identified errors in area calculations, particularly for the triangle and square, emphasizing the importance of using accurate formulas. The triangle is confirmed to be non-equilateral, affecting the center of mass calculations. Final area calculations were verified, leading to a consensus on the correct values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of geometric shapes: triangle, square, circle
  • Familiarity with area calculation formulas for these shapes
  • Knowledge of center of mass concepts in composite bodies
  • Basic algebra for verifying calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the formulas for calculating the center of mass of composite shapes
  • Practice area calculations for triangles, squares, and circles
  • Learn about the implications of shape properties on center of mass
  • Explore software tools for visualizing composite bodies and their centers of mass
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering courses, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone involved in geometric analysis or composite body calculations.

aaronfue
Messages
118
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the image below, calculate the center of mass (x-bar,y-bar) of the composite body.

Homework Equations



I've used all of the equations for area for the shapes needed (triangle, square, circle).

The Attempt at a Solution



I have attached my calculations and would appreciate if someone could verify that they are correct.

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Center of Mass Problem.JPG
    Center of Mass Problem.JPG
    14.4 KB · Views: 757
  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    30.5 KB · Views: 599
Physics news on Phys.org
x and y for the triangle look strange, and your area calculations are wrong.
 
The table in your figure contains mostly formulas with no data.
 
@Steamking: I've attached both the images with formulas and with the answers to the calculations to view.

@mrb: I believe it is NOT an equilateral triangle therefore the formula should be correct. And the area calculations for the rest of the shapes I've verified to be correct as well.
 

Attachments

  • Formulas.JPG
    Formulas.JPG
    29.2 KB · Views: 647
  • Calculations.JPG
    Calculations.JPG
    24.4 KB · Views: 572
aaronfue said:
@mrb: I believe it is NOT an equilateral triangle therefore the formula should be correct.
Who is mrb?
Of course it is not equilateral, it has 1 and sqrt(5/4) as sidelengths.
Judging from your formulas in columns F and G and rows 3 to 5, columns D and E are supposed to have the center of mass position of the geometric object. y=1.75 is certainly not the y-position of its center of mass (it is outside the whole object), and x=0.5 is wrong as well.

And the area calculations for the rest of the shapes I've verified to be correct as well.
Consider the square, for example: It has a height of 1 and a width of 1, so its area is 1. Your formula, however, gives 1.5. Even worse: It gives the same area for the hole, which is obviously wrong.
 
Sorry...mfb.

I did notice those errors for the areas and they should be correct...now.
 
That looks good now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K