Centrifugal force and angular velocity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between centrifugal force and angular velocity, particularly focusing on how centrifugal force varies with radius in different contexts. Participants explore theoretical aspects and clarify concepts related to angular velocity, centrifugal force, and their mathematical representations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that with a constant angular velocity, centrifugal force increases with radius, leading to confusion about the relationship between radius and centrifugal force.
  • Others clarify that if tangential velocity is held constant, centrifugal force decreases with increasing radius, which implies a smaller angular velocity.
  • A participant explains that centrifugal force is a fictitious force in non-inertial reference frames and provides a mathematical expression for it.
  • There is a qualitative description of the experience of centrifugal force when standing at different positions on a spinning disc, illustrating the concept further.
  • Technical corrections are made regarding the representation of angular velocity in equations, with suggestions for proper notation in LaTeX.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between radius, angular velocity, and centrifugal force, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the definitions of angular velocity and centrifugal force are not fully explored, and the discussion includes varying interpretations of the terms involved.

Lsos
Messages
803
Reaction score
9
According to the wikipedia page, when given an angular velocity, centrifugal force increases with radius. I always thought the larger the radius, the smaller the centrifugal force. I think I'm misunderstanding some term here (possibly "angular velocity"). Can someone please explain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Angular velocity \omega is the rate at which angle changes with respect to time (revolutions per second, degrees per second, radians per second, etc). If this rate is a constant, then the larger your distance to the center r is, the larger the centrifugal force F you will feel.

F = m \;r\;\omega^{2}

However, if you are saying your tangential velocity v = r\;\omega is constant, then the farther out from the center you are, the smaller the centrifugal force you experience, but this also means your angular velocity is smaller too.

F = m \frac{v^{2}}{r}
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Hi Lsos! :smile:
Lsos said:
… given an angular velocity, centrifugal force increases with radius.

Yes, if the angular velocity is fixed, the larger the radius, the more force you need to keep something in the circle.

Loosely speaking, changing the velocity from v to -v in the same time is obviously a larger acceleration if v is larger! :wink:
I always thought the larger the radius, the smaller the centrifugal force. I think I'm misunderstanding some term here (possibly "angular velocity"). Can someone please explain?

Angular velocity is angle per second.

It's equal to revolutions per second times 2π. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Hi,
The centrifugal force is a fictitious force used in non-inertial reference frames. In general, it is given by $$ F_{\text{centrifugal}} = m\textbf{w} \times (\textbf{w}\times\textbf{r}). $$ Here, ## \textbf{w} ## is the angular velocity of the rotating reference frame and ## \textbf{r} ## is the position of the particle relative to the rotating frame's origin.

Usually it will simplify to jfizzix' answer (the first equation).

From a more qualitative perspective, imagine a large disc spinning. If you stand near the centre, you move in a small circle but not very fast. As you move out, you move faster and faster and you will find it more difficult to stay on the disc.

:)

PS: I used ##\textbf{w}## because for some reason the TeX code for omega isn't working... :\
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
quarkgazer said:
PS: I used ##\textbf{w}## because for some reason the TeX code for omega isn't working... :\
I think your use of the bold face text is the problem. Latex assumes what follows is text. You can use vectors like this$$ F_{centrifugal} = m\vec{\omega} \times (\vec{\omega} \times \vec{r}) $$

AM
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Ok...yeah. I think I get it. Seems like a very simple concept, but I just need to wrap my aging mind around this. Thanks everyone!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
6K