Centripetal Force: Spinning, Ejected Matter & Velocity

AI Thread Summary
When a piece of matter loosely held by gravity spins on an axis, if the centripetal force exceeds the gravitational force, the matter can separate. The separated pieces will conserve angular momentum and continue to rotate, albeit with potentially altered spin dynamics. The gravitational force acts as the centripetal force, meaning there is only one force at play in this scenario. If another piece is ejected after the first, its velocity will depend on the dynamics of the interaction, making it difficult to predict whether it will have a larger or smaller velocity than the original piece. Overall, the conservation of angular momentum plays a crucial role in the behavior of the ejected matter.
THE 1
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
If you had a piece of matter which was loosly held together by gravitational interaction spinning on an axis and the centripetal force being produced was larger than the gravitational force holding the matter together would the matter that has become separate due to the centrapetal force still be spinning or would it be ejected with no spin? Also if another piece of matter was ejected after the original piece would it have a larger or smaller velocity than that of the original ejected piece?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
THE 1 said:
If you had a piece of matter which was loosly held together by gravitational interaction spinning on an axis and the centripetal force being produced was larger than the gravitational force holding the matter together would the matter that has become separate due to the centrapetal force still be spinning or would it be ejected with no spin? Also if another piece of matter was ejected after the original piece would it have a larger or smaller velocity than that of the original ejected piece?
Centripetal force is NOT "produced." Centripetal force is "required" in order for an object to undergo circular motion. In this case the gravitational force would be the centripetal force. In other words, there are not two forces, just one, gravity, which in this case will be "centripetal" (which is a directional indicator, meaning "pointing to center").

So, in the case that the spin is so much that the gravitational force is not enough to provide the necessary centripetal force, the parts that make up the object will travel further apart.

As the parts travel away from each other they will still conserve angular momentum, and will continue rotating themselves. Since it is the net (total) angular momentum that is conserved, and since the parts will have some dynamic interaction amonst themselves (for a while at least) it would be a very difficult calcualtion to predict how much spin each part will have.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top