Centripetal Force: Why Don't Planets Fall from Sun?

AI Thread Summary
Centripetal force is essential for keeping planets in orbit around the Sun, as it is provided by gravitational attraction rather than direct manipulation like spinning a cup on a string. Unlike the cup, which requires continuous force to maintain its motion due to air resistance, planets move in a vacuum where such resistance is absent. The Sun's gravitational pull creates a curvature in spacetime, allowing planets to maintain their orbits without needing external force adjustments. The discussion highlights the difference between applied forces in a mechanical system and gravitational forces in celestial mechanics. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the dynamics of planetary motion.
Quincy
Messages
228
Reaction score
0
Suppose if you're spinning a thread by your finger that has a cup attached to it at the other end. You would need to keep wobbling your finger or the cup would stop spinning, right? Then why doesn't the Sun wobble to keep the planets spinning around it? Or does the cup stop spinning because of the downward gravitation force?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quincy said:
Suppose if you're spinning a thread by your finger that has a cup attached to it at the other end. You would need to keep wobbling your finger or the cup would stop spinning, right? Then why doesn't the Sun wobble to keep the planets spinning around it? Or does the cup stop spinning because of the downward gravitation force?


I still haven't finished high school so i might be wrong, so here goes :) ...

when you wobble your fingers, i think you might be applying the tension which acts as the centripetal. The tension would be equivalent to the gravitational pull of the sun towards the earth. In addition to that, the Earth is moving at a constant speed (though i think its slowing down?), While the cup face frictional forces like air resistance, so tangentially its decreasing some of the force you apply by your fingers, most proabably also causes some sort of tangential acceleration too.

Please if I'm wrong correct me, I will be having a quiz on this topic, which me luck :D

thanks,
 
Abdou said:
I still haven't finished high school

lol same here.

I forgot about air resistance; so I guess if you spin the cup in outer space, it will keep on spinning without having to wobble your finger.
 
The sun keeps the planets in place via gravitational attraction...the curvature of spacetime.

Your finger has no gravitational attraction to a cup...at least it's negligible...you move the cup via the string via directly applied force...you apply centrifugal force to the cup; centripetal force holds in for accelerating from you...not gravity...
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Back
Top