Centripetal Motion and Masses at the Fair

AI Thread Summary
Centripetal motion in rides, such as those with chairs hanging from chains, demonstrates that all chairs rise at the same angle regardless of the mass of the occupants. This occurs because the ratio of centripetal force to weight, both of which are proportional to mass, results in the mass canceling out. The angle of rise is determined by the angular speed and the length of the chains. To calculate the height each chair rises, Newton's 2nd law is applied, considering the net force in the horizontal direction and the tension in the chain. Understanding these principles clarifies the mechanics behind the ride's operation.
catenn
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi, I was told about Centripetal Motion and learned some about rides at the fairs. There is one ride with chairs hanging by a chain in a circle that simply rotates at a certain speed without turning at any angle. Does anyone understand why all of the chairs move up at the same angle even though each person will have a different mass, and even the empty chairs move the same. How can all of the masses cancel? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It turns out that the angle a chair rises depends on the ratio of the centripetal force (which is proportional to mass) to the weight (which is also proportional to mass). So the mass does cancel. As long as the chains are the same length, the seats will rise to the same angle for a given angular speed regardless of the mass of the person.
 
Thank you very much!
 
What procedure do you exactly follow to determine the height each chair is going to rise?
 
Apply Newton's 2nd law. The chairs are centripetally accelerated, so there is a net force in the horizontal direction. Realizing that the tension in the chain acts along its length allows you to calculate the angle the chain makes with the vertical.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top