Challenge 19: Infinite products

  • Thread starter Thread starter micromass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Challenge Infinite
micromass
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
22,169
Reaction score
3,327
Infinite Products

This weeks challenge is a short one:

Calculate
\int_0^\infty \prod_{n=1}^{+\infty} \cos\left(\frac{x}{2^n}\right)dx

Please list any sources that you have used to solve this question. Using google or other search engines is forbidden. Wikipedia is allowed but not its search engine. Wolfram alpha and other mathematical software are not allowed.

Points will be given as follows:
1) First person to post a correct solution to one of the above points will receive 3 points (So if you solved 3 and 4, you will receive 6 points).

2) Anybody to post a (original) correct solution to one of the above points will receive 1 point.

3) Anybody posting a (nontrivial) generalization of some of the above questions will receive 2 points

4) The person who posts a solution with the least advanced mathematical machinery will receive 1 extra point for his solution (for example, somebody solving this with basic calculus will have an "easier" solution than somebody using singular homology), if two people use the same mathematical machinery, then we will look at how complicated the proof is.

5) The person with the most elegant solution will receive 1 extra point for his solution (I decide whose solution is most elegant)

Private messages with questions, problem suggestions, feedback, etc. are always welcome!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Too easy. I'll post the final result first, then add posts to derive this. The answer is:
## \pi / 2 ##
 
Answer:
##\pi / 2##

Attacking the infinite product first, I'll write that product more formally as $$\lim_{N\to\infty} \Pi_{n=1}^N \cos\left( \frac x {2^n} \right)$$
I'll denote the Nth partial product ##\Pi_{n=1}^N \cos(x/{2^n})## as ##P_N(x)##. Is there a simple way to express ##P_N(x)##?

Note that for N=1, we have ##P_1(x) = \cos \frac x 2##. Multiplying both sides by ##2\sin\frac x 2## yields ##2 \sin\frac x 2 P_1(x) = 2 \sin\frac x 2 \cos \frac x 2 = \sin x##. Thus ##P_1(x) = \frac {\sin x}{2 \sin\frac x 2}##. Multiplying ##P_1(x)## by ##\cos \frac x 4## yields ##P_2(x)##: ##P_1(x) \cos \frac x 4 = \cos \frac x 2 \cos \frac x 4 = P_2(x) = \frac {\sin x \cos \frac x 4}{2 \sin\frac x 2}##. The denominator ##2 \sin \frac x 2## can be rewritten as ##2 (2 \sin \frac x 4 \cos \frac x 4)## using the fact that ##\sin(2t) = 2\sin t \cos t##. Thus ##P_2(x) = \frac {\sin x}{4 \sin\frac x 4}##. This suggests that $$P_N(x) = \frac {\sin x}{2^N \sin \frac x {2^N}}$$.

The base case has already been established (twice). All that remains to prove this is to show that the above relation holds for ##P_{N+1}(x)## assuming that it holds for ##P_N(x)##. Multiplying both sides of the above expression for ##P_N(x)## by ##\cos \frac x {2^{N+1}}## yields $$P_N(x) \cos \frac x {2^{N+1}} = \frac {\sin x \cos \frac x {2^{N+1}}}{2^N \sin \frac x {2^N}}$$ Via the double angle formula, ##\sin \frac x {2^N} = 2\sin \frac x {2^{N+1}} \cos x \frac x {2^{N+1}}## Thus $$P_N(x) \cos \frac x {2^{N+1}} = P_{N+1}(x) = \frac {\sin x}{2^{N+1} \sin \frac x {2^{N+1}}}$$

The desired infinite product is the limit ##\lim_{N\to\infty} P_N(x)##. Since ##\lim_{x\to a} \frac 1 f(x) = \frac 1 {\lim_{x \to a} f(x)}## if the second limit exists and is non-zero, we have $$\lim_{N\to\infty} P_N(x) = \frac {\sin x}{\lim_{N\to\infty} 2^N \sin\frac x {2^N}} = \frac {\sin x} x$$

Thus we have ##\int_0^{\infty} \frac {\sin x}{x} dx = \lim_{t\to\infty} \int_0^t \frac {\sin x}{x} dx##. This is the sine integral, ##\operatorname{Si}(t)##. Integrating ##\frac {\sin x} x## from 0 to infinity is a well-known result. It's ##\frac {\pi} 2##.There's one problem with the above: What if ##\sin \frac x {2^N}## is zero for some N?
 
Last edited:
That ##\sin \frac x{2^N} = 0## for some positive integer N means that ##x## is an integral multiple of ##2\pi##. There are two cases to worry about: ##x=0## and ##x=2k\pi## where ##k## is a positive integer. When ##x=0##, ##\cos \frac x{2^N}## is identically equal to one for all N, and thus the infinite product is one in this case. Since ##\lim x\to 0 \frac {\sin x } x = 1##, there's no problem at x=0.

The other problematic cases involve x being a positive integral multiple of ##2\pi##. With these, there is always going to be one term in the infinite product that is zero, thus making the infinite product zero. At these points, ##\frac {\sin x}x## is zero, so there's no problem at ##x=2k\pi##.Resources:
- Double angle formula ##\sin(2t) = 2\sin t \cos t##
- Common knowledge that ##\int_0^{\infty} \frac {\sin x} x dx = \frac{\pi} 2##.
- Simple handing of special cases ##x=2k\pi##.
 
Last edited:
DH already did most of the stuff. Only thing left to prove is the integral. :-p

$$ \begin{aligned}
\int_0^{\infty} \frac{\sin x}{x}\,dx &= \int_0^{\infty} \int_0^{\infty} e^{-xt}\sin(x)\,dx\,dt\\
&=\int_0^{\infty} \Im\left(\int_0^{\infty} e^{-(i+t)x}\,dx\right)\,dt\\
&=\int_0^{\infty} \Im\left(\frac{1}{i+t}\right)\,dt\\
&=\int_0^{\infty} \frac{1}{1+t^2}\,dt \\
&=\frac{\pi}{2}
\end{aligned}$$

And yes, this problem is definitely very easy.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top