Change in a vector upon rotation of the coordinate frame

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the change in a vector upon rotation of the coordinate frame, specifically in the context of angular momentum and rotational invariance. The original poster seeks clarification on the equation ΔA = ΔΦ x A, where ΔΦ is a vector associated with the rotation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the equation ΔA = ΔΦ x A, questioning the validity for small versus large rotations. There is a discussion about the relationship between the gradient of a scalar potential and the vector ΔΦ, with some participants expressing confusion about these concepts.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts, with some providing insights into the nature of rotation vectors and the right-hand rule. There is an ongoing exploration of how to represent the direction of rotation and its implications for vector changes.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the distinction between small and large rotations, indicating that the equation may only hold under specific conditions. There is also mention of conventions used in vector representation and cross products, which may influence the understanding of the problem.

Jigyasa
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi everyone. We were discussing conservation of angular momentum as a consequence of rotational invariance in class. There was one point where we needed to compute the change in a vector A when the coordinate frame is rotated by angle Δ(Φ).

Homework Equations


The teacher said that ΔA = ΔΦ x A (cross product), where ΔΦ is a vector perpendicular to the plane of rotation. I am not sure if I understand this equation correctly.

The Attempt at a Solution


This is how I understand it:
Consider rotation in the x-y plane. As Φ is an angle in the x-y plane, grad(Φ) will be in the direction of the outward normal (z direction). Now, (grad(Φ) x A) will give the direction of A

The problem is, I think I'm mixing up grad(Φ) and the vector ΔΦ. Can someone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jigyasa said:
ΔA = ΔΦ x A (cross product), where ΔΦ is a vector perpendicular to the plane of rotation.
That is only valid for small rotations. For example, consider a radius vector length r in the plane and subjecting it to a small rotation dθ. The endpoint moves by rdθ at right angles to the radius vector. If we represent the rotation by a vector normal to the plane then we can write the new radius vector as ##\vec r'=\vec r+\vec r\times\vec{d\theta}##.
Jigyasa said:
grad(Φ)
No, grad is an entirely different beast. If you see grad(φ) written then almost surely the φ is very different too. It would be a scalar potential as a function of position, ##\phi=\phi(\vec r)##. grad(φ) would be the vector formed by the partial derivatives of φ along the different coordinates.
 
haruspex said:
That is only valid for small rotations. For example, consider a radius vector length r in the plane and subjecting it to a small rotation dθ. The endpoint moves by rdθ at right angles to the radius vector. If we represent the rotation by a vector normal to the plane then we can write the new radius vector as ##\vec r'=\vec r+\vec r\times\vec{d\theta}##.

No, grad is an entirely different beast. If you see grad(φ) written then almost surely the φ is very different too. It would be a scalar potential as a function of position, ##\phi=\phi(\vec r)##. grad(φ) would be the vector formed by the partial derivatives of φ along the different coordinates.

How do you take the direction of dθ

I understand till the equation is in magnitude form. To convert it into vector form, I need to write dθ as a vector and then take its cross product with A
 
Jigyasa said:
How do you take the direction of dθ
A rotation can be represented by a vector with magnitude proportional to the extent of rotation and direction indicating the axis. It is not very useful for large rotations, but normally only used with infinitesimal ones and, thus, for derivatives - angular velocity and angular acceleration.
A convention is needed to decide which way along the axis the vector points. As far as I know, the right-hand rule is universal. If in your view of the rotation it is clockwise then the vector points away from you. This convention requires a corresponding convention for the cross product and the equations involved. E.g. tangential velocity is ##\vec r\times\vec \omega##, not the other way around.
 
Understood. Thanks a lot :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K