Change in Acceleration: Analyzing Force Time Curve

AI Thread Summary
A force plate measures force in Newtons based on mass and gravitational acceleration, which can change with vertical displacement. When rolling across the plate, the force/time curve remains flat due to no vertical displacement, indicating no change in force. The discussion centers on whether the vertical displacement represents a change in acceleration or velocity, with the consensus leaning towards it being a change in acceleration. A curved force/time curve indicates a change in acceleration over time, while a straight line would signify a change in velocity. Therefore, the analysis confirms that the observed changes relate to acceleration rather than velocity.
david smith
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
All

If I stand on a force plate it will measure a force in Newtons equivalent to my mass X acceleration due to Gravity, let's say that is 1000N. If I displace the mass vertically (and I'm only interested in force normal to the force plate) then there will be a change in the force applied.

Again if I roll across the force plate on a roller skate then a force is applied and the force /time curve characterised will be flat because there is no displacement of the mass vertically.

So my question is if there is always an acceleration due to gravity then does the acceleration due to vertical displacement of the mass represent a change in acceleration or a change in velocity. Which is the more correct term?

This change in acceleration or velocity can be characterised on a computer screen as a force time curve. As the mass is constant then the curve actually represents a change in acceleration. If the curve were a straight line slope then this would be a change in velocity i.e.
acceleration but as the line is curved then this represents a change of acceleration over time.

Is this correct?

Cheers Dave Smith
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The force plate will measure the force, which will be mass times acceleration. If there is no change in velocity there will be no acceleration and no change in measured force. Imagine an arrangement which consists of a crane, also mounted on the force plate. If the crane is lifting the mass at a steady speed, the force plate will record the same value as when the mass is hanging, stationary, on the crane. Whilst starting or stopping, however, there will be a change in 'apparent weight' - i.e. force on the plate.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top