Change in gravitational field strength

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the change in gravitational field strength from sea level to the top of Mont Blanc, which is 4807 m high. The gravitational field strength at sea level is given as 9.826 N/kg, and participants express confusion about how to approach the problem. They discuss the need to apply Newton's law of universal gravitation, which involves the mass of the Earth and the distance from its center. One participant emphasizes the importance of attempting the problem independently rather than seeking direct answers. The conversation highlights the challenges of understanding introductory physics concepts in an online learning environment.
leslie1016
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The tallest spot on Earth is Mt. Everest. But another well-known mountain is the Mont Blanc, European Alps, which is 4807 m above sea level. If the radius of the Earth to sea level is 6367 km, how much does the gravitational field strength change between the sea level value at that location (9.826 N/kg) and the top of the Mont Blanc?




The Attempt at a Solution



I don't even know how to begin. :-(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
leslie1016 said:

Homework Statement


The tallest spot on Earth is Mt. Everest. But another well-known mountain is the Mont Blanc, European Alps, which is 4807 m above sea level. If the radius of the Earth to sea level is 6367 km, how much does the gravitational field strength change between the sea level value at that location (9.826 N/kg) and the top of the Mont Blanc?




The Attempt at a Solution



I don't even know how to begin. :-(

What is the equation for the force of gravity, in terms of the mass of the Earth, the mass of whatever you're weighing, and the distance between the two centers of mass? It has a big "G" constant in it as well...
 
I have no idea. I am supposed to be in an introductory course and it doesn't seem to be that way. On top of that it's an online course.
 
Thank you! But, I'm still confused. How do I set it up? Once I get it setup I can solve it.
 
leslie1016 said:
Thank you! But, I'm still confused. How do I set it up? Once I get it setup I can solve it.

Nope. You need to do the work, leslie. We don't do your homework for you. You wouldn't be learning if we showed you the relevant equations and set everything up for you.

Re-read the question, and read the link that I provided, and think through how you can use that equation for this problem. Show us your work and we can try to help more.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top