Change in Temperature of a 2-D Temperature Field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing a two-dimensional temperature field defined by the expression T=4x^2y^2+3y^3. Participants are tasked with finding the temperature gradient at a specific point and determining the change in temperature along a given curve at that point.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss evaluating the gradient of the temperature field and how to compute the dot product with a unit vector along a specified curve. There is uncertainty about how to handle the right-hand side of the curve equation and the implications for parameterization.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different methods to parameterize the curve and differentiate it to find a tangent vector. Some guidance has been offered regarding the differentiation process and the evaluation of vectors at the point of interest.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion regarding the parameterization of the curve and the evaluation of the temperature gradient, indicating a need for clarity on the relationship between the variables involved.

ColdFusion85
Messages
141
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A two-dimensional temperature field is given by the expression [tex]T=4x^2y^2+3y^3[/tex]
(a) What is the magnitude and direction of the temperature gradient at the point (2,3)?
(b) What is the change in temperature [tex]dT/dS[/tex] at the point (2,3) in a direction along the curve [tex]3x-4y^2=-30[/tex] passing through the point (2,3)?

Homework Equations


[tex]T=4x^2y^2+3y^3[/tex]
[tex]3x-4y^2=-30[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



So part (a) is pretty easy. I just found the gradient and evaluated it at the given point. However, I'm stuck on part (b). I think I have to take the dot product of the gradient of T with some unit vector of that curve. However, I don't know how to formulate this dot product. I figure that I first evaluate the gradient of T at (2,3), and then get a unit vector for that curve, evaluate that result at (2,3), then take the dot product to get dT/dS. Is this correct? If so, how do I handle the RHS of the curve? Would I move it over to the LHS and then find the unit vector? Would the 30 have to be squared when finding the magnitude of the curve too? I guess I'm a little confused with how to handle the nonzero RHS.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you can find x=(4y^2-30)/3, you can write the points (x,y) on the curve as a function only of the parameter y, like ((4y^2-30)/3,y). Now take d/dy to find a tangent. The RHS of the curve disappears when you differentiate.
 
Sorry, I'm still a little confused. I see how you got x=(), but then are you saying I differentiate that equation, x(y), or do I plug that into T for x, and take grad(T)?
 
((4y^2-30)/3,y) parametrizes the curve in terms of the variable y. If I take d/dy of that vector I get a another vector that is tangent to the curve. You want to find the tangent vector at (2,3) to dot with your gradient at (2,3).
 
But if I parametrize the equation in terms of only y, there will be no x to plug in the 2 of the (2,3) point. I would have curve=(4y^2-30)/3 i + 1 j. Differentiating that would give me (8/3)y i evaluated at (2,3).
 
No, the curve is i*(4y^2-30)/3+j*y. You get (8/3)yi+j for the derivative. You don't need to plug x=2 into anything. If you know y, then you know x. Just plug in y=3. That gives you 2i+3j or (2,3) on the original curve.
 
x=(4y^2-30)/3*i
y=y*j

So, S=(4y^2-30)/3*i + y*j

dS=(8/3)y*i+1*j

eval @ (2,3),

dS=8*i+1*j

So, I do (8xy^2*i + (8x^2y+9y^2)*j) DOT (8*i + 1*j) to get dT/dS

Is this correct?
 
I thought you were planning on normalizing the tangent vector so it was a unit vector.
 
Oh,right. So it would be 8/sqrt(65)*i + 1/sqrt(65)*j

Then dot grad(T) with this, and eval @ (2,3) to get dT/dS = 1152/sqrt(65)*i + 177/sqrt(65)*j?

Is this correct?
 
  • #10
dT/dS isn't a vector, is it? It's a real number. It's the dot product of two vectors.
 
  • #11
Oh yeah, that's what I meant to do. Thanks for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K