MHB Change of bases with log tables

  • Thread starter Thread starter cbarker1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bases Change Log
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the logarithm of 825.6 to the base 3 using logarithm tables. The method involves applying the change of base formula, where $\log_{3}(825.6)$ is expressed as the ratio of $\log(825.6)$ to $\log(3)$. The user calculates $\log(825.6)$ as approximately 2.91677 and $\log(3)$ as 0.47712, leading to the computation of $\log_{3}(825.6)$. There is some confusion regarding whether to drop the last digit or interpolate when using the log tables for accuracy. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding logarithmic properties and the correct application of log tables for precise calculations.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Hi everyone,

I need some help to solve this problem:

The direction states to find the value by using the log table

$\log_{3}\left({825.6}\right)$

Work:

I using the change of base:
$\log_{3}\left({825.6}\right)=\frac{\log\left({825.6}\right)}{\log\left({3}\right)}$

I look up the values of the logarithm of 3 and 825.6.

$\log\left({825.6}\right)=.91677+2$ =$\log\left({8.256}\right)+2$

$\log\left({3}\right)=.47712$

yields

$\log_{3}\left({825.6}\right)=\frac{2.91677}{.47712}$

Taking the log of both sides:
$\log\left({\log_{3}\left({825.6}\right)}\right)=\log\left({\frac{2.91677}{.47712}}\right)$

Using the log identity to dividing to difference:
$\log\left({\log_{3}\left({825.6}\right)}\right)=\log\left({2.91677}\right)-\log\left({.47712}\right)$

Finding the values of log(2.91677) and log(.47712)

Do I drop the last digit in (2.91677 and .47712) and look up the first four digits or do I interpolate the last digits by using the Table of proportional parts?

Thank you,

Cbarker
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Sorry, I'm a bit confused. What exactly are you being asked to compute?
 
Compute the value by using log table
$\log_{3}\left({825.6}\right)$
 
I think I would observe:

$$825.6=\frac{2^6\cdot3\cdot43}{10}$$

And now apply some log properties, and then use the change of base as needed. :D
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top