I Change of variables clarification

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Milsomonk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Variables
Milsomonk
Messages
100
Reaction score
17
Hi all,
I am looking for clarification on what is probably a pretty basic change of variables between a few lines in the following paper:

https://journals.aps.org/prd/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevD.34.1326

Equation (9) shows the differential cross section for a Bremsstrahlung process which creates an axion instead of a photon, the cross section is expressed as a differential in ##x## where ##x=E_a/E_e##, the ratio of the emitted axion energy to initial electron energy. Between Equation (8) and (9) a change of variables takes place such that ##\frac{d\sigma}{d E_a} \rightarrow \frac{d\sigma}{d x}##. What is the correct process to reverse this change of variable so that I have the cross section expressed as differential in axion energy ##E_a##? I infer that the author must have done the following substitution (I express the particular algebraic form of the cross section as ##f## for brevity):

$$ \frac{d\sigma}{d E_a} = f(E_a/E_e) = f(x)$$
$$\frac{d\sigma}{d x} = \frac{d\sigma}{d E_a}\cdot \frac{dE_a}{dx} = f(x)* E_e$$

If this is correct, then to reverse the change of variables we have:

$$\frac{d\sigma}{d E_a} = \frac{d\sigma}{d x}*\frac{dx}{dE_a}=f(E_a/E_e)\frac{1}{E_e}$$

Or have I missed something?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Milsomonk said:
Hi all,
I am looking for clarification on what is probably a pretty basic change of variables between a few lines in the following paper:

https://journals.aps.org/prd/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevD.34.1326
I'm not able to access that paper.
Milsomonk said:
Equation (9) shows the differential cross section for a Bremsstrahlung process which creates an axion instead of a photon, the cross section is expressed as a differential in ##x## where ##x=E_a/E_e##, the ratio of the emitted axion energy to initial electron energy. Between Equation (8) and (9) a change of variables takes place such that ##\frac{d\sigma}{d E_a} \rightarrow \frac{d\sigma}{d x}##. What is the correct process to reverse this change of variable so that I have the cross section expressed as differential in axion energy ##E_a##? I infer that the author must have done the following substitution (I express the particular algebraic form of the cross section as ##f## for brevity):

$$ \frac{d\sigma}{d E_a} = f(E_a/E_e) = f(x)$$
$$\frac{d\sigma}{d x} = \frac{d\sigma}{d E_a}\cdot \frac{dE_a}{dx} = f(x)* E_e$$
Assuming ##E_e## is a constant, then that should be straightforward.
Milsomonk said:
If this is correct, then to reverse the change of variables we have:

$$\frac{d\sigma}{d E_a} = \frac{d\sigma}{d x}*\frac{dx}{dE_a}=f(E_a/E_e)\frac{1}{E_e}$$
This contradicts the previous equations. Instead:
$$\frac{d\sigma}{d E_a} = \frac{d\sigma}{d x}*\frac{dx}{dE_a}=f(E_a/E_e) E_e\frac{1}{E_e} = f(E_a/E_e)$$
 
I think that I have seen this question before, but I could not find my post. Could you at least cite the paper (Author, title, etc.)?
 
PeroK said:
I'm not able to access that paper.

Assuming ##E_e## is a constant, then that should be straightforward.

This contradicts the previous equations. Instead:
$$\frac{d\sigma}{d E_a} = \frac{d\sigma}{d x}*\frac{dx}{dE_a}=f(E_a/E_e) E_e\frac{1}{E_e} = f(E_a/E_e)$$

Thanks for your response, both ##E_e## and ##E_a## are variables, not constant.
 
fresh_42 said:
I think that I have seen this question before, but I could not find my post. Could you at least cite the paper (Author, title, etc.)?

The paper is "Axion Bremsstrahlung by an electron beam" - Yung Su Tsai (1986)
 
I have got a stage where I have a cross section of the form:

$$ \frac{d\sigma}{dx} = A\cdot x$$

Where ##x=\frac{E_a}{E_e}##, ##E_a## and ##E_e## are both variables, ##A## is a constant and I wish to express the cross section as ##\frac{d\sigma}{d E_a}##. But I am not sure how to do this change of variables correctly.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top