Change of variables in double integral

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on changing the order of integration in double integrals, specifically using the example of the integral \int_{0}^{2} \int_{\sin{y}}^{(y-1)(y-2)(y-3)} e^{x^3} dx dy. Participants emphasize the necessity of finding inverse functions and rearranging the bounds to facilitate integration. The Fubini theorem is highlighted as a crucial principle, stating that the iterated integral can be transformed into a double integral over a defined region S. The conversation also suggests sketching the region to better understand the bounds and the need to potentially split the region into subregions for accurate integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of double integrals and iterated integrals
  • Familiarity with the Fubini theorem
  • Knowledge of inverse functions in calculus
  • Ability to sketch and analyze two-dimensional regions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Fubini theorem in detail to understand its applications in changing the order of integration
  • Learn techniques for finding inverse functions in calculus
  • Practice sketching two-dimensional regions defined by inequalities
  • Explore examples of splitting regions for integration to handle complex bounds
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and integral calculus, as well as educators teaching these concepts.

yitriana
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
[tex] \int_{c_1}^{c_2} \int_{g_1 (x)}^{g_2 (x)} f(x,y) dy dx[/tex]

If f(x,y) is function such that it is not easily integrable, if we wanted to switch the bounds of integration so that h1(y) = g1(x) , same for g2(x),
what would be the general way to rewrite the bounds? Would it involve inverse functions?

Let me clarify with a specific (easy) example:

[tex] \int_{0}^{4} \int_{2}^{\sqrt{y}} e^{x^3} dx dy[/tex],

rewriting sqrt(y) = x as y = x2, and finding intersection points would enable us to rewrite as,

[tex] \int_{0}^{2} \int_{0}^{x^2} e^{x^3} dy dx[/tex]

and make it possible to integrate.

==

So, how would we rewrite something like

[tex] \int_{0}^{2} \int_{\sin{y}}^{(y-1)(y-2)(y-3)} e^{x^3} dx dy[/tex]

in solvable terms?

Would we have to find the inverse of sin{y} and the other function as a function of x and make those the bounds for dy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yitriana said:
what would be the general way to rewrite the bounds? Would it involve inverse functions?
Geometry helps. Your bounds describe a two-dimensional region S in the Euclidean plane. Explicitly, S is the set of all solutions to the system of inequations:
[tex]c_1 \leq x \leq c_2[/tex]
[tex]g_1(x) \leq y \leq g_2(x)[/tex]
and the main theorem (Fubini) you're invoking is that if f is a sufficiently nice function, then this iterated (one-dimensional) integral is equal to the (two-dimensional) integral over the region:
[tex]\int_{c_1}^{c_2} \int_{g_1(x)}^{g_2(x)} f(x, y) \, dy \, dx = \int_S f[/tex]

If you want to switch the order of integration, then you need to rearrange the above system of equations. Quite frequently, this requires splitting the region S into several subregions. For example, suppose S was given by
[tex]-1 \leq x \leq 1[/tex]
[tex]2x^2 - 1 \leq y \leq x^2[/tex]​
(Sketch this region on a sheet of paper)

(No seriously, go sketch it before you continue reading)

I think (hope) it's clear that you should separate S into three regions:

Region I: [itex]y \leq 0[/itex]
Region II: [itex]y > 0[/itex] and [itex]x \leq 0[/itex]
Region III: [itex]y > 0[/itex] and [itex]x > 0[/itex]

(These three regions cover the entire plane. This makes sure that I don't accidentally "lose" or "overcount" any points -- every point in S is guaranteed to be in exactly one of these three regions. It would have been okay to let them overlap along a line, though)

In Region I, my system of equations is
[tex]y \leq 0[/tex]
[tex]-1 \leq x \leq 1[/tex]
[tex]2x^2 - 1 \leq y \leq x^2[/tex]​

It should be clear how to express this region as a system of inequalities that let's you write down an iterated integral with the variables reversed. You can grind it out through purely algebraic manipulation if you wanted to (including discovering the way to split it into three regions), but it's not an exercise I would recommend except as algebra practice.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K