Characteristic Equation for Asin(Wt) + Bcos(Wt): Explained

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the characteristic equation related to the homogeneous solution of a differential equation expressed in the form Asin(Wt) + Bcos(Wt). Participants are exploring the meaning and derivation of the characteristic equation and its relevance to finding solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of a "guess" solution of the form e^{rt} and question the reasoning behind this approach. There are inquiries about the meaning of notation such as "x with two dots" and how it relates to derivatives. Some participants suggest that the form of the solution should align with the equation being solved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have offered guidance on the use of the guess solution and the notation involved, while others express confusion about the foundational concepts of calculus and differential equations. There is no explicit consensus yet on the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There are indications that some participants may be struggling with the mathematical background necessary for the topic, suggesting a potential gap in understanding the prerequisites for solving such differential equations.

Ry122
Messages
563
Reaction score
2
http://users.on.net/~rohanlal/qM.jpg
I don't understand how this answer is obtained for the homogenous solution.
What does characteristic equation in "r" mean and how does it help achieve the final solution of Asin(Wt) + Bcos(Wt)?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
They use a "guess" solution. They guess that the solution is of the form e^{rt}. Plug this "guess" solution into your homogeneous differential equation and you will see how to obtain the characteristic equation.
 
what does x with two dots mean? why would u guess e^rt, isn't the form of the guess supposed to be the same as the form of the equation?
 
Dots are derivatives, two dots is a double derivative. Just plug in the "guess" solution I provided you and show me your work and results.

Define "form of the equation".
 
Perhaps what the OP means is when you are solving for the nonhomogeneous part, that part of the solution takes the form of the forcing function.
 
Remember that e^(i*x) = cosx + i*sinx, so e^(i*wt) = ? and e^(i*-wt) = ?
 
Last edited:
This is very peculiar! You are apparently trying to do a differential equation but don't seem to know the basics even of calculus. "x with 2 dots over it" is a standard notation for the second derivative; x" and dx/dt are also often used. "Assuming" a solution of the form e^{rt}[/tex] (even though in this case, it isnt&#039;, strictly speaking) is a standard method of arriving at the &quot;characteristic equation&quot; of the differential equation.<br /> <br /> You may be trying to read a physics book that is assuming you know more mathematics than you do. (The dot notation is more common in physics than mathematics.) If so, either skip over the &quot;mathematics&quot; parts or start with a more basic physics book.<br /> <br /> (I just realized this is posted under &quot;homework&quot;. Talk to your teacher about what leve of mathematics you are expected to know.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K