Characteristic function in prbability

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the characteristic function in probability, specifically its definition through integration. A user attempted to evaluate the integral by parts, resulting in an infinite value that contradicts established definitions. Other participants suggest that a Taylor series expansion of the exponential function is typically used to derive moments. There is a request for clarification on the specific integral being evaluated and a suggestion to learn LaTeX for better mathematical communication. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in understanding characteristic functions and integration techniques.
O.J.
Messages
198
Reaction score
0
I was reading about it here:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/CharacteristicFunction.html
very neat. But then I tried out of boredom integrating the expression by parts where u = the exponential term and v = f (x) (or P(x)). The integral came out nicely as I got a term similar to the left hand side except with a different coefficient. Anyway, the evaluated integral was infinite, which contradicts with this link. Is there something wrong with my logic? Can any of you try evaluating the expression by integration by parts and show ur results? thank u
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what integral you are evaluating. From what I see a Taylor series expansion is done on the exponential function and the moments come out by definition. That said. I didn't really read the link.
 
The integral I am talking about is the integral that defines the characteristic function. the definition.
 
O.J. said:
The integral I am talking about is the integral that defines the characteristic function. the definition.

Show your steps. I think my previous comment still applies.
 
I don't know how to use that Latex math language :(...
 
O.J. said:
I don't know how to use that Latex math language :(...

You should learn, it is easy.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top