Charge density of carbon nanotubes and graphene

In summary, the conversation discusses the process of finding the charge density difference between a nanotube and graphene. There is a question about how to properly unfold the nanotube in order to compare its charge density with that of graphene. Suggestions are made to compare the two-carbon unit cell of each structure or to map the nanotube onto a flat surface. There is also a question about whether to preserve the distances or modify the charge density in the mapping process. The conversation ends with a hint to combine the given charge densities on the grid points and "map" the nanotube.
  • #1

Nod

5
0
Hi everyone!
I'm trying to solve the following problem: given the charge densities of carbon nanotubes and graphene, the charge density difference of 2 systems must be found. So I need to unfold in some way the nanotube and compare it charge density with the graphene's one. But how this unfolding process should be done? I mean, the nanotube has different distances between the carbons than the graphene, should it be so also once I map it on the plane? Or is it fine to just map it as a graphene structure and find some way of describing the charge density in an adequate manner? And which way would be adequate?
Thanks for any ideas, because I'm out of any.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I suppose it depends on what you're after, but maybe just compare the 2-carbon unit cell of graphene to an analogous 2-carbon "unit cell" of nanotubes. Otherwise, you'll have to worry about boundary conditions and such.
 
  • #3
The boundary conditions are already applied to the nanotubes. I was given a hint that I need to open up the nanotube and "map" it: just like the mapping of the round Earth is made on a flat surface. But even in this case I saw that there are manu ways of doing it. Should I preserve the distances? Or modify the charge density? The charge densities for both cases are given as values on the grid points.
 
  • #4
Is this for homework? I think your answer consists in combining:
Nod said:
The charge densities for both cases are given as values on the grid points.
and
Nod said:
"map" it
Does each case have different numbers of grid points?
 

1. What is the charge density of carbon nanotubes and graphene?

The charge density of carbon nanotubes and graphene refers to the amount of electric charge per unit volume that is present in these materials. It is typically measured in units of coulombs per cubic meter (C/m3).

2. How does the charge density of carbon nanotubes and graphene affect their properties?

The charge density of carbon nanotubes and graphene plays a crucial role in determining their electrical, mechanical, and thermal properties. Higher charge density can lead to stronger electrical conductivity, greater mechanical strength, and improved thermal stability.

3. How is the charge density of carbon nanotubes and graphene calculated?

The charge density of carbon nanotubes and graphene can be calculated using equations that take into account the number of electrons present in the material, the size and geometry of the structure, and the type of bonding between atoms.

4. What factors can affect the charge density of carbon nanotubes and graphene?

The charge density of carbon nanotubes and graphene can be affected by several factors, including the type and number of dopants (atoms or molecules added to change the electronic properties), defects in the structure, and the surrounding environment.

5. Can the charge density of carbon nanotubes and graphene be controlled or manipulated?

Yes, the charge density of carbon nanotubes and graphene can be controlled and manipulated through various methods such as chemical doping, electrical gating, and mechanical strain. This allows for the customization of their properties for specific applications.

Suggested for: Charge density of carbon nanotubes and graphene

Back
Top