Charge density of carbon nanotubes and graphene

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison of charge densities between carbon nanotubes and graphene. Participants explore how to unfold a nanotube to facilitate this comparison, considering the differences in atomic distances and charge density representation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests comparing the 2-carbon unit cell of graphene to an analogous unit cell of nanotubes, implying that this could simplify the analysis.
  • Another participant notes the need to "map" the nanotube similarly to how the Earth's surface is represented on a flat map, raising questions about preserving distances and modifying charge density during this process.
  • There is a mention of boundary conditions already being applied to the nanotubes, indicating that this aspect has been considered in the problem setup.
  • A participant questions whether the different cases have varying numbers of grid points, which could affect the comparison of charge densities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how to approach the unfolding and mapping of the nanotube, with no consensus on the best method to compare charge densities. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of the unfolding process and its implications for charge density representation.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the need for clarity on how to handle distances and charge density modifications during the mapping process, as well as the implications of boundary conditions and grid point differences.

Nod
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone!
I'm trying to solve the following problem: given the charge densities of carbon nanotubes and graphene, the charge density difference of 2 systems must be found. So I need to unfold in some way the nanotube and compare it charge density with the graphene's one. But how this unfolding process should be done? I mean, the nanotube has different distances between the carbons than the graphene, should it be so also once I map it on the plane? Or is it fine to just map it as a graphene structure and find some way of describing the charge density in an adequate manner? And which way would be adequate?
Thanks for any ideas, because I'm out of any.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose it depends on what you're after, but maybe just compare the 2-carbon unit cell of graphene to an analogous 2-carbon "unit cell" of nanotubes. Otherwise, you'll have to worry about boundary conditions and such.
 
The boundary conditions are already applied to the nanotubes. I was given a hint that I need to open up the nanotube and "map" it: just like the mapping of the round Earth is made on a flat surface. But even in this case I saw that there are manu ways of doing it. Should I preserve the distances? Or modify the charge density? The charge densities for both cases are given as values on the grid points.
 
Is this for homework? I think your answer consists in combining:
Nod said:
The charge densities for both cases are given as values on the grid points.
and
Nod said:
"map" it
Does each case have different numbers of grid points?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K