Charge on conducting and non-conducting body

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter siddharth5129
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Charge Conducting
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The charge distribution on a non-conducting body can occur throughout its entire volume, while a conducting body only allows charge to reside on its surface. This distinction arises because charges in non-conductors are bound to atoms and can create dipole moments under an electric field, leading to polarization. In contrast, conducting bodies cannot maintain electric fields internally; any internal charges would move to cancel the field, resulting in no excess charges within. Gauss's Law confirms that there is no net enclosed charge within a conducting sphere, reinforcing the principle that electric fields do not exist inside conductors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law
  • Familiarity with electric fields and charge distribution
  • Basic knowledge of conductors and non-conductors
  • Concept of dipole moments in dielectrics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Gauss's Law applications in electrostatics
  • Explore the concept of polarization in dielectric materials
  • Investigate the behavior of electric fields in conductors versus non-conductors
  • Learn about dipole moments and their effects in electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of electrostatics and charge distribution in materials.

siddharth5129
Messages
94
Reaction score
3
the charge on a body can be distributed throughout the entire volume only if the body is non-conducting,and the charge on a conducting body can reside only on the surface. I'm confused , why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All charges are surrounded by lines of force (electric fields). If there are charges iwithin conducting bodies, there are also electric fields. But electric fields don't exist in conducting bodies, because if there were, the charges would move (conduct) to cancel the electric fields. Therefore there are no free (excess) charges within conducting bodies. There can be charges on the inside surface of a conducting sphere, but only if there are matching free charges within the enclosed volume. Gauss's theorem in the conducting sphere (integral[E*n da] = integral [rho dv] = 0) requires no electric field within the conducting sphere, so no net enclosed charge. In short, use Gauss's Law.
 
Last edited:
Bob S said:
All charges are surrounded by lines of force (electric fields). If there are charges iwithin conducting bodies, there are also electric fields. But electric fields don't exist in conducting bodies, because if there were, the charges would move (conduct) to cancel the electric fields. Therefore there are no free (excess) charges within conducting bodies. There can be charges on the inside surface of a conducting sphere, but only if there are matching free charges within the enclosed volume. Gauss's theorem in the conducting sphere (integral[E*n da] = integral [rho dv] = 0) requires no electric field within the conducting sphere, so no net enclosed charge. In short, use Gauss's Law.

thanks... i got it ... but why can the charge be distributed throughout the entire volume only for a nonconducting body??/
 
Because the charges are generally thought of as being bound to the atoms/molecule that make up the bulk material. Certain things can happen, but only over a limited distance. For example, in a non-conducting dielectric, the field does not strip the electrons and moves them about like it can in a conductor, but rather it stretches the atom into a dipole moment. The electrons bunch in the direction of the electric field leaving the nucleus to move away. This results in a small dipole moment. Since the bulk's dipole moments will follow the field, you get polarization within the dielectric.

The charge gets distributed throughout by the fact that it is restricted from moving about the bulk, unlike in a conductor.
 
well ...yeah ..that makes sense...thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
557
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K