Charge on inner surface of conducting shell

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves three concentric conducting shells with specified charges, and the question is about determining the charge on the inner surface of the outermost shell. The subject area relates to electrostatics and properties of conductors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the distribution of charge on the shells and the implications of Gauss's law. Questions arise regarding the electric field within the conducting material and the behavior of charges on the inner and outer surfaces of the shells.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the problem with various participants offering insights into the application of Gauss's law and the conditions for electric fields within conductors. Some participants express confusion about the implications of charge distribution and the calculations involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of specific information regarding the thickness of the shells, which may affect their reasoning. There is also a recognition of the need to clarify assumptions about charge behavior in electrostatic conditions.

yeahhyeahyeah
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Three thin (but finite thickness) concentric conducting shells have radii R1 < R2 < R3 and charges -2Q, +Q, and +3Q respectively, where Q is some positive number. What is the charge on the inner surface of the outmost shell?

Homework Equations



Charge on a conductor is always on outermost surface?

The Attempt at a Solution



So therefore the charge on the inner surface of the outermost shell should be zero? I do not know if this is right. So basically the charge of each shell is transferred to the outermost surface of the outermost shell? I am confused. The answer is 0, right? Just out of curiosity then what's the charge on the outer surface of the outermost shell?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yeahhyeahyeah said:
Charge on a conductor is always on outermost surface?
That's not true.

But what is true is that the electric field within the conducting material must be zero. (In the electrostatic case.) Use that fact and Gauss's law to figure out what the charge must be on the inner surface.
 
OK wait, so, if there are 3 concentric conducting shells,

The electric field within the actual solid part of each shell is 0? Is that what you mean?
What is the electric field in the empty space between two of the shells?

If the inner surface of the outermost shell had excess charge, why would it stay there? Wouldn't it transfer immediately to the outside?
 
yeahhyeahyeah said:
The electric field within the actual solid part of each shell is 0? Is that what you mean?
Yes.
What is the electric field in the empty space between two of the shells?
It depends on the charge contained within the shells. Use Gauss's law to find out.

If the inner surface of the outermost shell had excess charge, why would it stay there? Wouldn't it transfer immediately to the outside?
No, why should it? What holds it there is the field from the charge within the hollow shell. Again, use Gauss's law.
 
Hey thanks a lot for your help by the way
Also here is what I've done so far:

R3=radius of outermost shell (and R2 and R1 respectively for middle and innermost shell)
-2Q = charge on innermost shell
+Q = charge on middle shell
+3Q = charge on outermost shell

Gauss law, so electric field on inner surface of outermost shell due to charge enclosed by inner 2 shells is
k(-2Q +Q)/R3^2

Electric field on inner surface of outermost shell due to charge of outermost shell... is 0?

I know the total electric field within the solid part of the outermost shell should be 0, but I cannot figure out how to set it that way. I am adding K(-Q)/R3^2 to what to get 0? The problem does not provide me with the actual thickness of the shell... but I feel that I should be working with 2 different radii to be able to get a solution, but besides R3 why would I use a different one?

Also I'm sorry for asking so many questions :X Thanks for your help so much!
 
yeahhyeahyeah said:
R3=radius of outermost shell (and R2 and R1 respectively for middle and innermost shell)
-2Q = charge on innermost shell
+Q = charge on middle shell
+3Q = charge on outermost shell
OK. These are the total charges on each shell. Those charges may be distributed over the inner and outer surfaces of each shell.

Do this: Imagine a Gaussian surface right inside the conducting material of the outer shell. (What's the field there?) The charge contained within that surface consists of: The charges from the two inner shells plus whatever charge is on the inner surface of the outer shell. What must the total charge be within that Gaussian surface? What can you deduce from that?
 
OK so total charge on outer shell = 3Q = charge on inner surface + charge on outer surface

Total electric field inside = 0
let charge on inner surface = w
then charge on outer surface = (3Q - w)
charge from inner spheres = -Q

(-kQ + kw)/r^2 + (3Q-w)/r^2 = 0

(w-Q) = (3Q-w)
2w = 4Q
w = 2Q

so the charge on the inner surface of the outermost shell is +2Q

idk if that is even remotely right?
 
yeahhyeahyeah said:
OK so total charge on outer shell = 3Q = charge on inner surface + charge on outer surface
Good.

Total electric field inside = 0
let charge on inner surface = w
then charge on outer surface = (3Q - w)
charge from inner spheres = -Q
Good. So what's the total charge within that Gaussian surface (mentioned in my last post) in terms of Q and w? And what must that total charge equal? (That will tell you what w is.)

(-kQ + kw)/r^2 + (3Q-w)/r^2 = 0
Not sure what you're doing here. Forget about trying to add fields.
 
OOH sorry,

so Gauss law:

integral (E . dA) = Qenc/epsiolon = (w + -Q)/epsilon

0 = Qenc

w - Q = 0
w = +Q = charge on inner surface (and therefore 2Q = charge on outer surface)

wait is that all i have to do? I'm very sorry for being so slow to get it.. lol
 
  • #10
Now you've got it! :wink:
 
  • #11
your help is really appreciated!
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
748
Replies
1
Views
943
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K