Charged Ion Beam and Electromagnetic Induction: A Neutralization Method

  • Thread starter Thread starter Crazymechanic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Charged Ion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interaction between charged ions and electromagnetic induction in a confinement tube. It clarifies that while a negatively charged plate can neutralize ions by donating electrons, a coil around the tube cannot reduce the ions' charge through electromagnetic induction. The coil may slow the ions down and convert some of their kinetic energy into electrical current, but it does not change their charge. The conversation emphasizes the distinction between charge, field, and potential, noting that while energy conservation applies, the ions' charge remains unchanged. Overall, the method proposed does not effectively neutralize the ions' charge.
Crazymechanic
Messages
831
Reaction score
12
A rather simple question.
A confinement of positively charged ions , a tube from the confinement and in the end of the tube a metal plate at a negative potential , if the charged ions are let to run towards the negative metal plate (which they would normally do) the plate would loose it's negative charge.
Does a winding around the tube which is the path which the ions would take towards the negative plate would neutralise their charge due to electromagnetic induction in the windings which they would pass towards the plate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Crazymechanic said:
Does a winding around the tube which is the path which the ions would take towards the negative plate would neutralise their charge due to electromagnetic induction in the windings which they would pass towards the plate?

No. The positive charged ions are atoms from which someone or something has stolen some of their electrons, and the only way of turning them back into neutral atoms is to return the missing electrons. The negative plate can do this by donating electrons to ions; the battery or whatever is maintaining it at a negative potential is providing a supply of electrons. The coil around the tube can't do that; back-EMF from the induction may slow the ions but it can't reduce their charge.
 
Well yes I understand that you can't just erase the ion charge as a property of atoms but I was rather thinking before the ions entered the tube with a winding around it they were say confined with a positive electrostatic confinement , now this positive confinement has raised their potential if I could say , and I was thinking that them passing through a coil would lower that as they would give the energy they had while coming out of the confinement to the coil through electromagnetic induction and so their energy would be atleast partly or fully converted to electrical current?
 
Crazymechanic said:
Does a winding around the tube which is the path which the ions would take towards the negative plate would neutralise their charge due to electromagnetic induction in the windings which they would pass towards the plate?

No.

Crazymechanic said:
I was thinking that them passing through a coil would lower that as they would give the energy they had while coming out of the confinement to the coil through electromagnetic induction and so their energy would be atleast partly or fully converted to electrical current?

Yes, although that's a completely different question than you originally asked. You're just turning fast-moving charged particles into slow-moving charged particles or vice versa.
 
Here we are again, CM. You are mixing the relationships between Charge, Field and Potential here, as before. If you bunch up ions, you do Work and increase the Potential in the beam. Total Energy is conserved so there must be a reduction in KE of the beam if PE is increased. The charge is not altered (charge density increases, locally) but the field on the periphery will increase in amplitude.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
36
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top