Charged particles passing through a magnetic wave?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of charged particles as they interact with magnetic fields, particularly in the context of magnetic waves. Participants explore whether it is possible for charged particles to pass through a magnetic field without being deflected, and the implications of timing and probability in such scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if a charged particle can enter a magnetic field at the right moment to avoid deflection, seeking calculations for such a scenario.
  • Another participant explains the deflecting force on charged particles in a magnetic field, noting that while speed increases the radius of the particle's path, it does not allow the particle to completely avoid the field's effects.
  • A participant suggests that if magnetic waves are random, there may be a theoretical probability of a particle passing through when both electric and magnetic fields are near zero, proposing a statistical approach to this phenomenon.
  • Further exploration is made into manipulating the timing of magnetic waves to coincide with the acceleration of particles, suggesting that this could increase the likelihood of particles passing through the field.
  • Another participant draws parallels to existing technologies like charged particle accelerators and questions the direction of the original ideas, mentioning concepts such as beam modulation and mass spectrometry.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and differing perspectives on the feasibility of charged particles passing through magnetic fields under specific conditions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the practical application of the proposed ideas.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the interaction between charged particles and varying magnetic fields, including the influence of electric fields and the randomness of magnetic waves. There are also references to existing technologies that may relate to the discussion, but no consensus is reached on the proposed theories.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying electromagnetism, particle physics, or engineering applications involving charged particles and magnetic fields.

Roy Stout
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Random thought...
Is it possible for a charged particle to travel fast enough, or simply enter a magnetic field at just the right time in the magnetic wave's cycle, to pass through the magnetic field unaffected?
If so, what is that calculation.
If not, why not.

Roy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The deflecting force is given by
F = qv B, where v and B are the velocity and magnetic field vectors. If you're not into vectors the simplest way to look at it is to say that, when the particle is traveling at rignt angles to the field lines, it will experience a force that's at right angles to the motion and the field (like Flemmings Left hand rule). The path of the particle will be circular. The faster the velocity, the stronger this force is BUT the radius of the path will increase, despite this. So, however fast the particle travels it will always be affected by the field it travels through. You can't dodge it by going fast enough :wink: but the deflection will be less and less. Same idea as when you calculate how far a bullet will drop on its journey. The faster it goes, the less it will lose height because the transit time is less. It may be fast enough to ake no odds over a short distance.

I notice you also mention a magnetic wave as the fields are varying in time. This is more complicated, of course and, if the particle crosses a directed (coherent) beam of EM waves, you could imagine dodging through when the E and B fields happen to be near zero in the cycle. If the waves are random them there will be no time when the fields are zero. (Plus there will be the effect of the E fields too.)
 
Thanks.
Your first answer was what I expected, but the second answer is interesting.
If the waves are random, then there should be a theoretical probability when E and B are both near zero in the cycle.
If so, then the probabilities would say, for example, that 1 in a billion (pure guess) particles would get through at this moment.
That moment could start as E & B are nearing their low point, passing through that low point, and then rising back to a point that would have significant reaction with the charged particles.
So during that "moment", is there a way to manipulated the waves, or their timing, to coincide with a generated particle speed, that is a speed achieved by accelerating particles, to take advantage of this "moment" where the laws of probabilities suggest 1 particle per billion would get through. If so, then the solution would be to create the sufficient magnetic field and then accelerate billions of particles such that at least 1 billion of them are arriving at the magnetic field during each "moment" cycle.
The probabilities would then suggest that at a particular moment the E and B fields would be near zero as the required number of charged particles are entering the field and at least 1 particle should pass through.
If this theory holds, then we should be able to work with the magnetic fields and a sufficient number of charged particles, to enable significantly more than 1 particle per "moment" to pass through.
If so, I have some other wonderings on how to put that to work.

This is just another thought experiment. Something that crossed my mind while watching the science channel...
Thanks
 
I have a feeling that you are thinking along the same lines as the operation of charged particle accelerators, perhaps of a type called "travelling wave' - or maybe the cyclotron. But, rather than choosing the point in time and space where the field is minimum, they choose the time and place where the fields are at their peak (to maximise energy transfer). Or would you be talking about 'beam modulation' - or even a form of mass spectrometer??
There are bits of lot of existing things in your post and I'm not sure exactly where you are going with your ideas.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K