Charges of capacitors in series and in parallel

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the behavior of capacitors in series and parallel configurations. In series, the charge on each capacitor is identical due to charge conservation, resulting in the total charge being equal to the individual charges (Q=Q1=Q2). In contrast, for parallel capacitors, the total charge is the sum of the individual charges (Q=Q1+Q2). This distinction arises because charge cannot cross the capacitor plates, and the voltage across each capacitor in series must equal the total voltage supplied by the battery.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of capacitor charge and voltage relationships
  • Familiarity with the concept of charge conservation
  • Basic knowledge of electrical circuits and battery connections
  • Ability to interpret capacitor equations, specifically Q = C * V
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of charge conservation in electrical circuits
  • Learn about the mathematical derivation of capacitor charge equations
  • Explore the differences between series and parallel circuits in depth
  • Investigate the effects of varying capacitance values on charge distribution
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of capacitor behavior in circuits.

greg_rack
Gold Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
79
Schermata 2020-10-28 alle 15.56.17.png
Very simply, I can't understand why the charges of capacitors placed in series are all the same, and why even the total one(of the circuit) is equal to those.
How is it possible that the total charge is the same as the individual ones?
There must be some concept/property about capacitors which I'm not getting.
On the other hand, for parallel capacitors, the total charge is the sum of those of the single capacitors, and that's what I would assume generally and logically.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the wire connecting the two capacitors. Assuming it was not given some additional charge, the sum of the charges on the two connected plates must be zero.
 
Doc Al said:
Consider the wire connecting the two capacitors. Assuming it was not given some additional charge, the sum of the charges on the two connected plates must be zero.
Why? Couldn't they just bring the potential to zero by having the sum of ##\frac{q}{C}## ratios equal to the battery voltage??
 
greg_rack said:
Why?
Because charge is conserved. They start with zero charge and that just gets distributed between the connected plates.

greg_rack said:
Couldn't they just bring the potential to zero by having the sum of ##\frac{q}{C}## ratios equal to the battery voltage??
Not sure what you are saying here. The battery voltage equals the sum of the voltages across each capacitor.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, etotheipi, vanhees71 and 1 other person
You should consider the total charge that moves to charge the capacitors.
In the series case the total charge that moves is ##Q=Q_1=Q_2## because first it moves through one capacitor and then the same(because they are in series) charge it moves through the second capacitor.
In the parallel case ##Q_1## charge moves through one branch and ##Q_2## charge moves through the other branch so the total charge that moves is ##Q=Q_1+Q_2##.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi, vanhees71, phinds and 1 other person
Another way of saying the same thing is this. Consider the "H" shaped conducting piece between the two capacitors. It is initially neutral and, because it is isolated from the battery, it remains neutral when the battery is hooked up. Thus the total negative charge on the left side of the H must be equal in magnitude to total positive charge on the right side. Since, by definition, the charge ##Q## on a capacitor is the absolute value on either one of its plates, the two capacitors must have the same charge. Note that no mention was made of the capacitance of each capacitor, therefore this result is true regardless of the capacitances; it's a result of charge conservation.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi, vanhees71, phinds and 1 other person
Yet another way of saying the same thing is to remember that the charge on a capacitor is given by ##q(t) = \int i(t) \ dt##. Since the capacitors are in series ##i(t)## is the same for all of them so ##q(t)## is also the same for all of them.

Simply put, charge conservation and the fact that charge does not cross the capacitor lead to this result.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi, vanhees71, greg_rack and 1 other person
Thanks guys, I got it!
 
  • Like
Likes kuruman, etotheipi, vanhees71 and 2 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K