Charges on the vertex of a triangle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field (E-field) at the third vertex of an equilateral triangle with two fixed positive point charges of +16.0 mC at two vertices, separated by 1.30 m in a vacuum. The equilibrium condition is established, leading to the equation Ea + Eb + Ec = 0, where Ea and Eb are the E-fields due to the two charges. The solution involves determining the y-components of the E-fields, as the x-components cancel out due to symmetry. The approach requires using trigonometric functions to resolve the vectors accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and Coulomb's law
  • Knowledge of vector addition and components
  • Familiarity with trigonometry for resolving vectors
  • Basic principles of electrostatics and equilibrium
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about Coulomb's law and its applications in electrostatics
  • Study vector addition and decomposition in physics
  • Explore the concept of electric field lines and their properties
  • Investigate static equilibrium conditions in electrostatic systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying electrostatics, electrical engineering, or anyone involved in solving problems related to electric fields and forces in static systems.

Rasine
Messages
208
Reaction score
0
Positive point-charges of +16.0 mC are fixed at two of the vertices of an equilateral triangle with sides of 1.30 m, located in vacuum. Determine the magnitude of the E-field at the third vertex.

so...all the particles are in equalibrum so that means F=ma=0

so if i call the third vertex c...Ea+Eb+Ec=0 so that means that Ea+Eb=-Ec

now i can write kqa/r^2+kqb/r^2=Ec and i just have to solve for Ec right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
note that E-fields are vectorial quantities. Ie. they have a direction. in your case, two point charges at two different location each exerting a Force radially, will induce two different field vectors at the the third spot. These two vectors are not parallel and so need to take the angle in between into account to get the right answer.

btw, the question doesn't seem to mention anything about the system being in equilibrium, just asking you work out the resulant field at third spot
 
ummm...so do i have to find in they x and y compnents and all that sutff?
 
Rasine said:
Positive point-charges of +16.0 mC are fixed at two of the vertices of an equilateral triangle with sides of 1.30 m, located in vacuum. Determine the magnitude of the E-field at the third vertex.

so...all the particles are in equalibrum so that means F=ma=0

so if i call the third vertex c...Ea+Eb+Ec=0 so that means that Ea+Eb=-Ec

now i can write kqa/r^2+kqb/r^2=Ec and i just have to solve for Ec right?

Try defining your coordinate system so you can locate the two known charges at -0.65m and +0.65m on the x-axis and then place third vertex appropriately on the y axis. This has a nice benefit. Since your two charges are equal and of the same polarity, the x components of the E fields that they produce at the third vertex will exactly cancel. So, you just need to find the y components and add them. The kQa/r^2 and kQb/r^2 are the magnitudes of the two E vectors but don't forget - they are pointing in different directions so you need to compute the y components according to their angles' with the y axis.

Don't panic - it's simple trig - sketch the two vectors at the 3rd vertex point keeping in mind that the E field for each charge is defined in terms of the force per unit positive test charge; i.e. the force which would be produced on a positive unit charge placed at the point under consideration. For your case, each charge would repel a unit positive test charge - notice the direction each would be trying to repel it. They're NOT the same direction. So, as you can see (if you really sketched the situation), you must find the vector sum of the two E vectors which, in this case, ends up being just the sum of their y components.

BTW - this is a static problem - there's no motion involved. It's like an ideal, instantaneous snapshot just before any motion could take place.

jf
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K