- #1
9986mkoh
- 4
- 0
Hi,
I'm new here and had a question relating to my senior design project in mechanical engineering. My project ends up involving a small DC electric motor, which needs to be able to be reversed and it would be nice to be able to have some speed variability.
I'm aware of speed controllers and I know how to reverse a DC motor just with polarity, so I'm going to have a 3 position switch for that. However, I'm unaware of exactly how to add some speed variability without actually buying a speed controller, which is an issue because we're on a sort of tight budget. Torque isn't a big issue either. My idea originally was to use a rheostat rated for the max amp load of the motor. For the most part, we are limited to sites like McMaster Carr but we can also use others if the parts are cheap to do this (since we'd be paying for it out of pocket). I've also heard of an H-bridge circuit to avoid the losses of a variable rheostat (potentiometer), but I'm not too familiar with that.
If anyone has any suggestions or comments on this idea, I'd greatly appreciate any help you could offer.
Thanks,
Mike
I'm new here and had a question relating to my senior design project in mechanical engineering. My project ends up involving a small DC electric motor, which needs to be able to be reversed and it would be nice to be able to have some speed variability.
I'm aware of speed controllers and I know how to reverse a DC motor just with polarity, so I'm going to have a 3 position switch for that. However, I'm unaware of exactly how to add some speed variability without actually buying a speed controller, which is an issue because we're on a sort of tight budget. Torque isn't a big issue either. My idea originally was to use a rheostat rated for the max amp load of the motor. For the most part, we are limited to sites like McMaster Carr but we can also use others if the parts are cheap to do this (since we'd be paying for it out of pocket). I've also heard of an H-bridge circuit to avoid the losses of a variable rheostat (potentiometer), but I'm not too familiar with that.
If anyone has any suggestions or comments on this idea, I'd greatly appreciate any help you could offer.
Thanks,
Mike