Checking Your Work: Did I Solve #14 Correctly?
- Thread starter Marcin H
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Current
Click For Summary
Homework Help Overview
The discussion revolves around a circuit problem involving Kirchhoff's Current Law, specifically focusing on the correctness of a solution to a previous problem and the interpretation of a new circuit setup. Participants express uncertainty about applying the law to the circuit and the implications of the circuit's configuration.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation
Approaches and Questions Raised
- Some participants attempt to verify the correctness of their previous solution while expressing doubts about its simplicity. Others raise questions about how to apply Kirchhoff's Current Law to a new circuit, particularly regarding identifying currents entering and leaving junctions.
Discussion Status
The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and guidance on applying Kirchhoff's Current Law. There is an exploration of different interpretations of the circuit, and some participants are beginning to clarify their understanding of the junctions and equations needed.
Contextual Notes
Participants mention constraints such as the need for clarity in communication and the challenges posed by the circuit's complexity. There is also a focus on the necessity of visual aids, like screenshots, to facilitate discussion.
- 45,584
- 2,459
- 11,987
- 1,584
That's correct.Marcin H said:Homework Statement
Did I do number 14 correctly? I have a feeling it's not that simple.Homework Equations
V=IR
i1=i2+i3+...In
The Attempt at a Solution
on picture
- 306
- 6
Ok good. I am stuck on #15 now. I'm haven't seen this kind of circuit yet, so I'm not sure how to apply kirchhoffs current law. I think A, B, and D are correct, but I'm not sure. I think all the squares in the circuit are power sources, but I'm not sure where to start in this circuit to make my loop and write out my equation.Doc Al said:Looks good to me.
- 45,584
- 2,459
Kirchoff's current law just says, for any point, the currents going into the point must equal those going out of the point. (You don't need to know anything about that kind of circuit to apply the law to each point.)Marcin H said:I'm haven't seen this kind of circuit yet, so I'm not sure how to apply kirchhoffs current law.
- 11,987
- 1,584
Do you know how to do screen shots, or use the snipping tool ? It's much more likely that you get help if we don't have to open new tabs/windows on our browser.Marcin H said:Ok good. I am stuck on #15 now. I'm haven't seen this kind of circuit yet, so I'm not sure how to apply kirchhoffs current law. I think A, B, and D are correct, but I'm not sure. I think all the squares in the circuit are power sources, but I'm not sure where to start in this circuit to make my loop and write out my equation.
All that is required for this problem is to apply Kirchhoff's Current Law.
You do not need to know what the squares represent at all.
- 45,584
- 2,459
- 20,989
- 2,934
It looks like you specified the units of the result as mA. That would be milliamps. Was that your intention?Marcin H said:Did I do number 14 correctly? I have a feeling it's not that simple.
- 45,584
- 2,459
Good eye!gneill said:It looks like you specified the units of the result as mA. That would be milliamps. Was that your intention?
- 306
- 6
I'm having a hard time with this. How do you know what is going in and what is coming out exactly. All the currents can come out of one point. I was trying to write an equation for the point above box c, but how can I tell what is going in and out. Also, I thought current flows to the spot with least resistance.Doc Al said:for any point, the currents going into the point must equal those going out of the point.
Edit: Also, I think I would understand this there were 2 points/junctions, but how do I do this with three?
- 306
- 6
Fixed. Thanks!gneill said:It looks like you specified the units of the result as mA. That would be milliamps. Was that your intention?
- 306
- 6
Sorry, I'm new here. How did you do that exactly?SammyS said:Do you know how to do screen shots, or use the snipping tool ? It's much more likely that you get help if we don't have to open new tabs/windows on our browser.
View attachment 94717
View attachment 94718
All that is required for this problem is to apply Kirchhoff's Current Law.
You do not need to know what the squares represent at all.
- 45,584
- 2,459
The currents have directions, specified by the arrows.Marcin H said:How do you know what is going in and what is coming out exactly.
- 11,987
- 1,584
OK.Marcin H said:Sorry, I'm new here. How did you do that exactly?
One of the first things to learn here is to make it clear as to what post (you did that fine) or what part of a post you are responding to.
If you were asking me, about that thing I did, and that thing was posting those images, see the following. Otherwise, Doc Al and others, will continue working with you.
In (Microsoft) Windows, there is a "Snipping Tool" application. Find it in the Applications folder in the list of programs.
It will take a 'snapshot' of the portion of your monitor's screen, that portion being determined by what you highlight. You may need to use the help feature provided by the Snipping Tool or google for more details.
Once you take a snapshot of whatever is of interest, you simply paste it into the reply window of PF .
- 306
- 6
I know, but I still don't see how I can find my equations. This is a very weird circuit. It looks like you can have many possibilities. EX. i1=i3+i4-i2 or i2=i3+i4-i1 (these 2 are the same thing actually). i5=-i3-i4 or i3 = i5+i4 (not sure about this one).Doc Al said:The currents have directions, specified by the arrows.
- 306
- 6
So I just copy paste a picture from a word document and it will display in a post like in your first post? Can I drag and drop pics from my desktop? Or is there a way to post them the way you did. i usually take a screenshot on my mac and post that.SammyS said:OK.
One of the first things to learn here is to make it clear as to what post (you did that fine) or what part of a post you are responding to.
If you were asking me, about that thing I did, and that thing was posting those images, see the following. Otherwise, Doc Al and others, will continue working with you.
In (Microsoft) Windows, there is a "Snipping Tool" application. Find it in the Applications folder in the list of programs.
It will take a 'snapshot' of the portion of your monitor's screen, that portion being determined by what you highlight. You may need to use the help feature provided by the Snipping Tool or google for more details.
Once you take a snapshot of whatever is of interest, you simply paste it into the reply window of PF .
- 11,987
- 1,584
The Snipping Tool allows you to take a snap shot of a relatively small portion of the screen, rather than snapping the whole screen. I'm not very familiar with the details of what's available on the Mac.Marcin H said:So I just copy paste a picture from a word document and it will display in a post like in your first post? Can I drag and drop pics from my desktop? Or is there a way to post them the way you did. i usually take a screenshot on my mac and post that.
I used the pdf file viewed in adobe reader and snapped a portion of that.
Yes, you can do the same with a word document.
- 3,489
- 1,163
You have four options. Check each option. You are asked to find which option(s) is(are) correct.Marcin H said:I know, but I still don't see how I can find my equations. This is a very weird circuit. It looks like you can have many possibilities. EX. i1=i3+i4-i2 or i2=i3+i4-i1 (these 2 are the same thing actually). i5=-i3-i4 or i3 = i5+i4 (not sure about this one).
- 45,584
- 2,459
There are three 'junctions', each marked by a dot. So you can have three equations.Marcin H said:I know, but I still don't see how I can find my equations. This is a very weird circuit. It looks like you can have many possibilities.
Good! But there's one more.Marcin H said:EX. i1=i3+i4-i2 or i2=i3+i4-i1 (these 2 are the same thing actually). i5=-i3-i4 or i3 = i5+i4 (not sure about this one).
Now just check to see which of the given equations are consistent with those.
- 306
- 6
One more? I can't find another. Re-arraging them i get A,B, and D fro my answers. i1+i2=i3+i4, i5=i1+i2, and i3+i4+i5=0Doc Al said:There are three 'junctions', each marked by a dot. So you can have three equations.Good! But there's one more.
Now just check to see which of the given equations are consistent with those.
- 45,584
- 2,459
Do you agree that the diagram shows three junctions? Each one deserves its own equation.Marcin H said:One more? I can't find another.
- 45,584
- 2,459
Good.Marcin H said:i1+i2=i3+i4,
Almost, but not quite.Marcin H said:i5=i1+i2,
Good.Marcin H said:i3+i4+i5=0
- 306
- 6
Hmm. So am I missing an equation for the junction above box C? it looks like i1, i2, and i5 would be coming out of that junction. So Does that mean i1+i2+i5=0?Doc Al said:Do you agree that the diagram shows three junctions? Each one deserves its own equation.
- 45,584
- 2,459
Exactly!Marcin H said:Hmm. So am I missing an equation for the junction above box C? it looks like i1, i2, and i5 would be coming out of that junction. So Does that mean i1+i2+i5=0?
- 306
- 6
Ok I see that now. Thanks! I have another question about Kirchoffs Voltage Law related to a different question. Should I make a new thread or may I ask here?Doc Al said:Exactly!
- 45,584
- 2,459
- 306
- 6
Ok. Did I do this problem correctly? I looked at the equations in the answers and then made loops that included those voltages and checked if they make sense. I don't know if this is the best way of looking at it. I think the correct answers are A, D, E.Doc Al said:Go ahead and ask it here, if it's closely related.
Also, quick side question about units. When using equations like P=IV or V=IR we use AMPS for our unit for current right? So if we are given 100mA we have to use .1A in the equation right?
- 45,584
- 2,459
Sounds good to me.Marcin H said:Ok. Did I do this problem correctly? I looked at the equations in the answers and then made loops that included those voltages and checked if they make sense. I don't know if this is the best way of looking at it. I think the correct answers are A, D, E.
Yes, standard units are amperes for current, so 100 mA = .1A. Good!Marcin H said:Also, quick side question about units. When using equations like P=IV or V=IR we use AMPS for our unit for current right? So if we are given 100mA we have to use .1A in the equation right?
- 306
- 6
- 306
- 6
Similar threads
- · Replies 1 ·
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 1K
- · Replies 9 ·
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 4K
- · Replies 6 ·
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 9 ·
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 16
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 31 ·
- Replies
- 31
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 10
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 5 ·
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 4K
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 1K
- · Replies 18 ·
- Replies
- 18
- Views
- 3K