Chemistry text minus memorization?

In summary, the conversation discusses the search for a good organic chemistry textbook that focuses on understanding principles rather than memorizing reactions. Morrison and Boyd and Peter Sykes are suggested as potential options, with Morrison and Boyd being a widely recommended and comprehensive text. The conversation also briefly mentions the use of Atkins and De Paula for physical chemistry. Overall, there is a consensus that Morrison and Boyd will provide a mechanistic approach and be beneficial for the exams.
  • #1
404
0
Hi,

I'm in high school (11th grade) in India and I'm looking for a good organic chemistry text. I'm very bad at memorizing reactions (memorizing anything, for that matter) but good at grasping physical concepts and math, like structure and quantum mechanics. I'm looking for a text that will allow me to predict reactions by understanding the underlying principles rather than memorize what happens when you mix this with that, even if that means I've to learn the principles at a somewhat advanced level. What will be a good text for me?

The IIT-JEE syllabus covers Nomenclature, isomerism, reactive intermediates (carbocations, carboanions, free radicals), alkane, alkene, alkyne, benzene, phenol, alkyl hallides, grignard reactions, alcohol, ether, carboxylic acids, amines, haloarenes, carbohydrates, amino acids and peptides, polymers, reaction mechanisms (homolytic and heterolytic bond cleavage, electrophilic addition, electrophilic substitution, nucleophilic substitution, nucleophilic addition).

I see that Morrison and Boyd is everywhere universally recommended. Will it suit my purposes?

I will also like to know if there is such a book (with emphasis away from memorisation) on inorganic chemistry, though our teacher (a professional researcher specialising in inorganic reaction mechanism who is eternally trying to convince us that inorganic chemistry is as interesting and as logical as organic) laments that no such textbooks are yet available.

Thanks very much for your help.

Molu
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No reccomendations? Will Peter Sykes be good?
 
  • #3
I used Morrison and Boyd for undergrad Organic. -- It's "the" text supposely. I unfortunately can't remember the advanced inorganic text we used (I DID really like that one) and my texts are currently boxed up for a move... I'll get back to you in about a month? What I remember most about the classes was that I took them from particularly good instructors... who were challenging but very good at explaining things.

Maybe it's because I'm a physics person, but I always viewed the primary interest in organic chemistry to be synthetic chemistry -- MAKING things -- so sometimes caring less about the governing principles, so much as caring that there were certain reactions and techiques that did work to make things. That inherently has a bit of memorization (for instance WHAT catalyst to use, and WHAT a grignards reagent is... :yuck: ). Now I RESPECT organic chemists... because they really have a purpose -- they design a structure and go out and make it... actually I probably think they have the most FUN of all chemists (the labs for the classes were really cool)... but I just know I'm a physics type of gal. I still use Morrison and Boyd as a reference, but mostly that's when I need to determine IUPAC names of molecules. :wink:
 
  • #4
Thanks. I guess you could call me a physics type of guy, that's why I'm more interested in structural features and underlying principles of chemistry rather than memorising what happens when.
 
  • #5
Another vote for Morrison and Boyd from me. It's a nice book, and the principles, mechanism, etc are very nicely explained. For inorganic, I used the book by J.D Lee. Although, inorganic chemistry involved a lot more memorization. Also, if you want a text on physical chemistry, have a look at the one by Atkins and De Paula. IMHO, that book is very very good.
 
  • #6
I do have Atkins De Paula, but since it does not cover from the grounds-up like most physics texts do, it's of very limited use to me.

It seems Morrisson and Boyd is a general purpose text and I'll be getting it, but does it provide the mechanistic approach I'm looking for or is it more focused towards the memorise reactions of functional groups type?
 
  • #7
loom91 said:
It seems Morrisson and Boyd is a general purpose text and I'll be getting it, but does it provide the mechanistic approach I'm looking for or is it more focused towards the memorise reactions of functional groups type?

The mechanism of most reactions are described in detail, with evidence. I think that M & B will suit your requirements very well. Also, many of the exercise problems are very challenging. So, I think it'll definitely help for your exam.
 

1. What is the best way to study chemistry without relying on memorization?

The best way to study chemistry without memorization is to focus on understanding the underlying concepts and principles. This will allow you to apply your knowledge to different scenarios and problems, rather than just regurgitating information.

2. How can I improve my critical thinking skills in chemistry?

Improving your critical thinking skills in chemistry involves practicing problem-solving and analysis. This can include working through practice problems, discussing concepts with others, and thinking critically about the information presented in your textbook or lectures.

3. Is it important to memorize chemical equations?

While it is important to understand the basic concepts and principles behind chemical equations, it is not necessary to memorize them. Instead, focus on understanding the patterns and relationships between elements and compounds, and how they interact in reactions.

4. How can I make studying chemistry more engaging and interactive?

One way to make studying chemistry more engaging and interactive is to use visual aids such as diagrams, charts, and videos to help you visualize and understand complex concepts. You can also try group study sessions or creating study games to make the material more enjoyable.

5. Can I use mnemonics to help me remember information in chemistry?

Mnemonics can be a helpful tool in remembering certain information in chemistry, such as the periodic table or common polyatomic ions. However, it is important to also understand the underlying concepts and not rely solely on mnemonics for memorization.

Suggested for: Chemistry text minus memorization?

Replies
3
Views
628
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
434
Replies
4
Views
915
Replies
1
Views
539
Replies
93
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
614
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top