Choosing a graduate advisor/project

  • Thread starter Thread starter cytochrome
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graduate
AI Thread Summary
Choosing a graduate lab can be daunting, especially regarding concerns about becoming too specialized. It's common for research topics to be narrow, as few general topics remain unexplored. However, the ability to learn how to conduct research is crucial and can facilitate transitions to different areas in the future. In industry, it is typical for professionals to shift focus away from their dissertation topics. Engaging with current graduate students and potential advisors can provide valuable insights into the implications of specialization and help make informed decisions. It's important to remember that individual preferences for advisors may vary, so gathering diverse opinions is beneficial.
cytochrome
Messages
163
Reaction score
3
I am at the point where I have to make a decision for which lab I will join in graduate school very quickly. The thing that scares me, however, is becoming too "specialized" in my decision to be qualified to do research in anything else. Is this the case for graduate school? Once I'm a postdoc researcher, will I be able to explore other labs?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I got my Ph.D. in mechanical engineering, specializing in noise and vibration, with my research on vibration of automotive belt drives. I didn't do a postdoc, so I can't say if your research topic would restrict the postdoc excessively.
But I will say that every topic you'd do research on, that can be finished in a reasonable time, will be narrow. There just aren't many "general" topics that haven't been thoroughly treated. In industry, it seems pretty common to move to other topics than in your dissertation. Learning how to research is just as important as the research itself.
 
That makes sense.

I'm also going for the PhD in mechanical engineering. I will be working on multiscale modeling in solid mechanics. I was wondering if I decided to do a postdoc in some other sort of material science related subject if I would be under qualified or too specialized. But you're right, learning how to research is the main importance.
 
  • Like
Likes Randy Beikmann
This says it all:
i-4679f7e2e6995c0a63c87a0ffb9dc42f-PI.type.comic.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Randy Beikmann
Have you talked with grad students from the various labs for their views on the issues you might have? Our have some of your classmates already done this and have this information for you. Check it out.
 
  • Like
Likes Randy Beikmann
What gleem says is gold. Interview potential advisors, and other grad students. Just remember when you get opinions that not all students have the same wants, so you might like a certain advisor better (or not) than someone else does.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
63
Views
8K
Back
Top